在系统评估癌症过度诊断的证据类别
Anton Barchuk1,2, Niko K Nordlund3, Alex L E Halme3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland anton.barchuk@helsinki.fi.
BMJ evidence-based medicine
|May 29, 2025
概括
癌症过度诊断,检测不会造成伤害的瘤,越来越多地被研究. 本综述综合了多个领域的证据,以评估其流行程度和规模.
科学领域:
- 在瘤学瘤学.
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 流行病学 流行病学
背景情况:
- 癌症过度诊断,检测那些永远不会造成伤害的瘤,是各种癌症类型中日益关注的问题.
- 对过度诊断的现有研究往往依赖于有限的数据或先前存在的担忧,需要更有系统的方法.
- 来自不同研究领域的综合证据对于全面了解癌症过度诊断至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 系统地评估和综合不同研究领域癌症过度诊断的证据.
- 评估用于识别过度诊断的各种证据类别的优缺点.
- 为了解和量化癌症过度诊断提供一个框架.
主要方法:
- 审查用于评估过度诊断的证据类别.
- 包括来自癌症监测的数据,真正的癌症患病率研究,诊断使用影响和癌症管理进展.
- 分析不同类别证据的优缺点.
主要成果:
- 确定了评估癌症过度诊断的四个关键证据类别:监测数据,真实流行率研究,诊断影响研究和管理/死亡率变化研究.
- 强调了每个证据类别固有的优点和局限性.
- 使用各种癌症类型的例子证明了这些类别的应用.
结论:
- 多领域证据综合方法对于准确评估癌症过度诊断的存在和程度至关重要.
- 了解每个证据类别的细微差别,可以对过度诊断进行更有力的评估.
- 这一框架可以指导未来关于癌症过度诊断的研究和临床实践.
相关概念视频
Cancer Survival Analysis
650
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
650
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Hazard Ratio
565
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
565
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
409
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
409
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
1.7K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.3K


