Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

577
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
577
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

219
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
219
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.4K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.4K
Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

650
Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
650
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

703
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
703

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The impact of epigenetics on health and disability.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Radical accessibility: co-designing for intersectionality in a peer-led LGBTIQA+ disability digital storytelling project.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Response to Open Peer Commentaries: "Reproductive Autonomy in Light of Expanded Prenatal Genomic Testing".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Developers Are Central for Mitigation of AI Bias.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Advances in reproductive technology mean rethinking the meaning of autonomy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

The 'knowing' body in the becoming of buprenorphine depot treatment: A qualitative study.

The International journal on drug policy·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K

自动化错误识别:残疾人的案例

Jackie Leach Scully1, Georgia van Toorn2, Sandra Gendera3

  • 1Disability Innovation Institute, UNSW Sydney, Goodsell Building, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia. jackie.leach.scully@unsw.edu.au.

Journal of bioethical inquiry
|June 3, 2025
PubMed
概括

医疗保健中的自动化决策 (ADM) 可能无法识别残疾人,使边缘化延续. 这项研究强调了对人工智能系统的关键需求,这些系统可以承认和验证残疾人的经验.

关键词:
人工智能的人工智能是人工智能.自动化决策的使用.障碍障碍是指残疾人的残疾.没有歧视的歧视.认识论上的正义是认识论上的正义.人类在循环中认可 承认 认可

更多相关视频

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.3K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.3K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.4K

科学领域:

  • 生物伦理学生物伦理学
  • 人工智能伦理学 人工智能伦理学
  • 关于残疾人的研究.

背景情况:

  • 生物伦理学越来越多地解决了围绕人工智能 (AI) 和自动决策 (ADM) 在医疗保健和研究中的伦理问题.
  • 现有关于人工智能正义的研究强调了人工智能系统如何加强社会边缘化.
  • 人工智能,ADM和残疾的交集在当前文献中仍然未被充分探索.

研究的目的:

  • 调查ADM对澳大利亚残疾人的影响.
  • 识别和分析AI和ADM在残疾背景下所带来的伦理挑战.
  • 让人们注意自动化系统的识别失败问题,这是残疾人经常提出的问题.

主要方法:

  • 基于经验的研究项目.
  • 通过与澳大利亚残疾人参与者的讨论进行定性数据收集.
  • 专注于残疾人关于ADM的经历和观点.

主要成果:

  • 残疾参与者一直担心自动化系统无法识别他们的独特需求和经验.
  • 这些未能得到ADM系统的认可,可能会导致边缘化,并使不平等持续下去.
  • 这些发现强调了人工智能伦理学文献中关于残疾和认可的重大差距.

结论:

  • 医疗保健和研究中的自动化决策系统在识别残疾人方面表现出严重的失败.
  • 解决这些认可失败对于确保人工智能应用中的正义和公平至关重要.
  • 需要进一步的研究和道德准则来开发包容性AI,尊重残疾人的多样性和经验.