一个探索性的混合方法的情绪分析的社会情感学习 (SEL) 获悉的资助书写工作坊在生物科学
Miroslav Suzara1,2, Courtney Peña1, Crystal Botham1,3
1Biosciences Grant Writing Academy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Journal of microbiology & biology education
|June 4, 2025
概括
融入社会情感学习 (SEL) 的资助写作研讨会显著减少了科学家们的负面态度,并促进了科学家们的积极看法. 这种方法通过解决情感挑战来改善赠款撰写体验.
科学领域:
- 生物科学 生物科学
- 学术研究学术研究
- 科学沟通科学沟通
背景情况:
- 拨款写作对于学术研究的成功至关重要,特别是在生物科学领域.
- 拨款写作往往与研究人员的重大焦虑和压力有关.
- 传统的培训往往忽视了补助书写的社会和情感方面.
研究的目的:
- 评估将社会情感学习 (SEL) 纳入赠款写作研讨会的影响.
- 评估参与者对干预后授予写作的态度和看法的变化.
主要方法:
- 设计了一个赠款撰写工作坊,集成了SEL组件.
- 研讨会之前和之后的调查对参与者进行了管理 (n=31).
- 用比较情绪分析来分析调查数据.
主要成果:
- 在研讨会结束后,对赠款撰写的负面态度下降了89%.
- 在研讨会结束后,对奖学金撰写的积极态度增加了143%.
- 干预表明参与者的情绪发生了显著的积极变化.
结论:
- 将SEL纳入赠款写作培训是有效的减轻压力和改善研究人员的态度.
- 解决社会和情感因素对于支持科学家在赠款撰写过程中至关重要.
- 这种方法为增强资助撰写支持服务提供了有价值的模型.
更多相关视频
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
9.5K
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
7.1K
相关概念视频
02:40The Scientific Method
62.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
62.2K
01:56Ethics in Research
24.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.1K