在二氨基离子和里德伯格激发状态中的局部和非局部电荷分布:密度函数的挑战性测试
Benedikt O Birgisson1, Marta Gałyńska1,2, Hemanadhan Myneni1
1Science Institute and Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Iceland, 107 Reykjavík, Iceland.
密度函数理论的计算揭示了N,N'-二甲基piperazine (DMP) 中的电子分布如何取决于福克交换和自我相互作用校正. 更强的福克交换或完全的自我相互作用校正有利于局部电子,这对于准确的激发状态和电离分子建模至关重要.
科学领域:
- 计算化学的计算化学
- 量子化学 是一个量子化学.
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
背景情况:
- 精确的电子分布建模对于理解分子性质至关重要.
- 密度函数理论 (DFT) 是一个强大的工具,但它的准确性取决于功能选择.
- 在激发和电离状态下,N,N-二甲基皮佩拉 (DMP) 的行为对DFT构成了挑战.
研究的目的:
- 测试各种密度函数在描述电子定位/移位方面的性能.
- 为了研究福克交换 (FE) 权重在混合函数中的影响.
- 评估SIC在DFT计算中的自我相互作用校正 (SIC) 对DMP的有效性.
主要方法:
- 计算使用了雅各布梯子上的密度函数,包括LDA,混合体和双混合体.
- 在其3s Rydberg兴奋状态和完全电离的DMP+离子中研究了DMP.
- 在PBE0中分析了不同FE权重的影响,并将完整和缩放的SIC应用于PBE.
主要成果:
- 常见的混合函数 (例如,0.25 FE 的 PBE0) 为 DMP+ 带来了非本地化的收费.
- 具有更高FE权重 (例如,PBE0(0.50),BHLYP) 和完全SIC的功能器产生局部充电最小值.
- 对于瑞德伯格州,PBE0(0.32) 显示了局部化和非局部化的洞,而PBE 显示的只有非局部化的洞.
结论:
- 在DMP中局部与非局部电子的平衡对DFT功能参数敏感.
- 需要更高的福克交换或完整的SIC来捕获电荷定位在电离化的DMP中.
- 减少自我交互错误对于准确的DFT预测DMP的Rydberg兴奋状态至关重要.
更多相关视频
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
08:22Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
Published on: August 6, 2018
相关概念视频
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Anions: Structural Overview
Due to the absence of continuous...
IR Absorption Frequency: Delocalization
In IR...
π Molecular Orbitals of the Allyl Cation and Anion
