测量错误可以解释肌肉和肌硬度和运动范围之间的关系的差异吗?这是一个盲目的可靠性和客观性研究
Konstantin Warneke1,2,3, Julia Meder4, Gerit Plöschberger4
1Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria. Konstantin.warneke@uni-graz.at.
European journal of applied physiology
|June 11, 2025
概括
硬度 (ST) 测量及其与运动范围 (ROM) 的联系是不可靠的,原因是设备差异和研究员偏差. 解决测量错误对于准确的ST和ROM评估至关重要.
科学领域:
- 生物力学和肌肉骨研究.
- 医学成像和测量科学 医学成像和测量科学
- 康复和物理治疗治疗.
背景情况:
- 组织度 (ST) 和运动范围 (ROM) 之间的关系受到争论.
- 测量错误和主观影响可能会影响这种关系.
- 需要对错误进行全面评估,以澄清ST-ROM相关性.
研究的目的:
- 分析系统和随机错误在组织ST和ROM之间的相关性中的作用.
- 用不同的设备评估ST测量的可靠性和客观性.
- 调查测量日和研究人员对ST-ROM关系的影响.
主要方法:
- 75名受试者参加了一项双盲可靠性研究.
- 测量了下腿ST (小腿肌肉,阿基勒斯肌) 和脚背部屈曲ROM.
- 方法包括剪波弹性学 (SWE),MyotonPRO和膝盖到墙壁 (KtW) 测试.
主要成果:
- 对于SWE和MyotonPRO (ICC=0.93-0.99) 的高内可靠性.
- 日间可靠性下降 (ICC=0.395-0.88);评分间的客观性有所变化 (ICC=0.61-0.96).
- 在ST测量之间没有一致性 (ICC=0-0.09);ST-ROM关系因研究人员和天而异.
结论:
- 组织ST的确定是设备依赖的.
- ST和ROM之间的关系受测量日和研究人员的影响.
- 临床相关的测量错误需要标准化,以提高ST评估的可靠性和客观性.
相关概念视频
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.5K
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K