Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

75.3K
Scientific Laws
75.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

225.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
225.2K
Models, Theories, and Laws01:16

Models, Theories, and Laws

5.2K
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
5.2K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

682
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
682
Genetic Lingo01:11

Genetic Lingo

102.1K
Overview
102.1K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.2K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Judgments of Responsibility for Inequality: A Framework and Review.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Laterality in face paintings of renaissance and cubism art styles.

Laterality·2025
Same author

How beliefs persist amid controversy: The paths to persistence model.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Evidence for multiple kinds of belief in theory of mind.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The effect of face race on metamemory: Examining its robustness and underlying mechanisms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
00:26

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.9K

俗人如何评价含有术语的科学解释.

Francisco Cruz1,2, Tania Lombrozo3

  • 1CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. franciscocorreiadacruz@gmail.com.

Nature human behaviour
|June 12, 2025
PubMed
概括

非专家往往更喜欢用术语进行科学解释,错误地认为这可以提高理解. 然而,鼓励平民自己解释概念可以提高他们对解释质量的判断.

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 科学传播科学传播

背景情况:

  • 个人依赖别人的专业知识来理解世界.
  • 对非专家来说,评估解释的质量是一项挑战.

研究的目的:

  • 调查为什么用术语的科学解释被普通人认为更令人满意.
  • 确定术语包含影响解释满意度和可理解性的条件.
  • 确定策略,以减轻含有术语的解释的偏见判断.

主要方法:

  • 在6698名参与者中进行了9项实验.
  • 专注于包含术语的科学解释.
  • 分析了术语对解释满意度和可理解性的影响.

主要成果:

  • 术语增加了解释满意度,因为普通人认为它填补了信息上的空白.
  • 尽管易懂度下降,术语导致更高的感知质量.
  • 参与解释生成会使判断变得愚蠢,并改善自我评估的校准.

结论:

  • 普通人依赖术语作为完整性的代理,这可能导致对解释质量的误判.
  • 积极参与,例如生成解释,可以提高对科学信息的批判性评估技能.

更多相关视频

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

5.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
00:26

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.9K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

5.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.3K