公平的ICP:识别偏见和增加在后实施临床决策支持的护理点的透明度,使用诱导性合规预测
Xiaotan Sun1,2, Makiya Nakashima1,2, Christopher Nguyen1,2
1Cardiovascular Innovation Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
概括
公平ICP通过为各种患者群体提供可靠的不确定性量化来增强人工智能 (AI) 临床决策支持系统 (CDSS). 这种AI公平性框架提高了准确性,并减少了护理点的偏见.
科学领域:
- 医学成像人工智能 医学成像人工智能
- 临床决策支持系统 临床决策支持系统
- 健康 公平 卫生 公平
背景情况:
- 由人工智能 (AI) 驱动的临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 由于偏见而面临可信性问题,导致不同患者亚群的绩效差异.
- 现有的公平缓解策略缺乏可扩展性和可访问性,未能在护理点确保公平.
研究的目的:
- 介绍FairICP,一个后实施框架,使用诱导性符合预测 (ICP) 来解决CDSS中的AI公平性.
- 提供可操作的模型不确定性的知识,这种不确定性是由对公平医疗保健的亚种群偏见引起的.
主要方法:
- 公平ICP采用ICP进行特定集团校准,以定义模型能力界限.
- 在心脏MRI,胸部X射线和皮肤病成像数据集 (公共和私人) 上进行评估.
- 评估预测绩效提升和不公平减轻.
主要成果:
- 与基线相比,FairICP的预测准确度提高了7.2%.
- 在数据集中平均减少了2.2%的亚群之间的准确性差距.
- 在值得信赖的能力边界内,证明了预测可靠性的提高.
结论:
- 公平ICP提供了一个强大的解决方案,以促进对AI-CDSS的信任和透明度.
- 促进不同患者群体在医疗保健中的平等和公平.
- 强调后处理方法对于AI-CDSS实施和监控的重要性.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
184
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
184
Blinding
3.2K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
163
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
163
Nursing Clinical Information System
881
Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
881
Hindsight Biases
3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
709
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
709


