概括
无意识的思维感知因果关系的时间和没有反事实,不同于有意识的推理. 这种对无意识因果关系的看法与逻辑含义和早期儿童理解相一致.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 精神分析是一种精神分析.
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
背景情况:
- 在梦和症状中明显的无意识思想,经常使用因果推理.
- 意识和无意识的因果感知可能会显著不同.
- 了解无意识的因果关系是解释心理现象的关键.
研究的目的:
- 检查无意识的因果感知的性质.
- 要区分无意识和有意识的因果关系概念.
- 提出一种理解无意识因果关系的模型.
主要方法:
- 无意识思维过程的理论分析.
- 区分无意识因果关系的时间和无否定特征.
- 对儿童因果理解的实验数据的审查.
- 对临床现象的应用.
主要成果:
- 无意识的因果关系是无时间的,不需要因果先于效果.
- 无意识的因果关系缺乏反事实推理;原因的缺失并不意味着效应的缺失.
- 无意识的因果关系可以在没有否定的逻辑中作为逻辑含义来建模.
结论:
- 无意识的因果感知与有意识的推理有着鲜明的区别.
- 提出的无否定逻辑内涵模型解释了无意识的因果关系.
- 这一框架为临床观察和儿童发育提供了洞察力.
更多相关视频
12:12Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
10.7K
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
5.7K
相关概念视频
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
386
The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
386
Reason and Intuition
6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Cause and Effect
11.4K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
682
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
682
Counterfactual Thinking
13
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
13
