强迫流离失所儿童群体的疫苗接种:系统性审查和元分析
Sargun Virk1,2, Andrew Milewski1,2, Nadia Khan3
1Human Rights Impact Lab, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
JAMA network open
|June 16, 2025
概括
强迫流离失所儿童的疫苗接种率极低,为21%. 诸如监护人教育和住房稳定等因素增加了接种疫苗的几率,而流离失所本身减少了它们,突出了改善医疗保健策略的迫切需要.
科学领域:
- 全球健康 全球健康
- 儿童传染病 儿童传染病
- 强迫流离失所的人口
背景情况:
- 接种强迫流离失所的儿科人口进行疫苗接种存在重大挑战.
- 在这个脆弱群体中,确切的疫苗接种率在很大程度上是未知的,这阻碍了针对性的干预措施.
研究的目的:
- 估计强迫流离失所的儿科人口的疫苗接种覆盖率.
- 在这个人口群体中确定与疫苗接种状况相关的因素.
主要方法:
- 我们对六个数据库 (PubMed,EMBASE,MEDLINE,Scopus,Web of Science,Cochrane) 进行了系统审查和元分析.
- 包括的研究是关于流离失所儿童 (<19岁) 接种疫苗的原始研究文章.
- 用随机效应模型提取和合成数据,通过Downs和Black Checklist评估质量.
主要成果:
- 包括来自24个国家的39项研究,总体完整疫苗接种覆盖率为21% (95% CI,11%-36%).
- 与疫苗接种率增加相关的因素包括更大的家庭规模,更高的监护人教育,父亲的就业,更高的收入,住房稳定性和获得医疗保健.
- 相反,被迫流离失所与较低的疫苗接种率有关 (OR,0.70;aOR,0.73).
结论:
- 在被迫流离失所的儿科人口中,接种疫苗的覆盖率显著低.
- 这些发现强调了针对性医疗保健策略和政策的关键需求,以提高这一脆弱人群的免疫率.
更多相关视频
09:37Detection of Polyfunctional T Cells in Children Vaccinated with Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine via the Flow Cytometry Technique
Published on: September 23, 2022
2.0K
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
692
相关概念视频
Vaccinations
45.3K
Overview
45.3K
Immunodeficiency Diseases
1.2K
Immunodeficiency disorders are conditions in which the immune system's ability to fight infectious disease and cancer is compromised or entirely absent. The immune system comprises a complex network of cells, tissues, and organs that work together to protect the body from potentially harmful invaders. When this system is deficient or not functioning properly, it leaves the body susceptible to infections, diseases, or other complications.
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency...
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency...
1.2K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
666
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
666
