Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

5
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
5
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.4K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

163
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
163
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Intensive care under uncertainty: a qualitative study of how older patients and their relatives wish to contribute to decision-making.

European geriatric medicine·2026
Same author

Addressing Healthcare Provider Moral Resilience in Global Context: Insights From an International Workshop.

Nursing & health sciences·2026
Same author

Readiness of Zanzibar's public health facilities to deliver NCD services: a cross-sectional survey toward UHC.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Harnessing rural community savings groups for contribution collection in the Zambia national health insurance scheme: an analysis of community perspectives using the motivation and ability framework.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Association between thyroidea function and opioid agonist therapy: a prospective cohort study from Norway.

Journal of the Endocrine Society·2026
Same author

Impact of the UNICEF Caring for the Caregiver intervention on mental health, social support, and parenting stress: a six-country pre-post evaluation.

The Lancet. Global health·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K

公平优先设定流程的10步方法:桑给巴尔的一个定性案例研究.

Omar Mwalim1,2, Sanaa Said2,3, Subira Suleiman1,4

  • 1Ministry of Health, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

Health systems and reform
|June 18, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究介绍了一种10步方法,以公平地确定卫生系统的优先级,确保对基本卫生服务的透明和包容性决策,特别是在资源有限的环境中.

关键词:
医疗保健系统 医疗保健系统在决策过程中做出决定.卫生公平性健康公平性卫生优先事项 卫生优先事项让利益相关者参与其中.

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K

科学领域:

  • 卫生政策和系统研究 卫生政策和系统研究
  • 全球健康 全球健康
  • 卫生经济学 卫生经济学

背景情况:

  • 全球卫生系统面临着资源短缺的问题,需要系统和公平的方法来优先考虑基本的卫生服务.
  • 对于建立透明和包容的优先设定流程,现有有限的实际指导.

研究的目的:

  • 提出一个10步方法来设计基本医疗保健套餐的公平优先设定流程.
  • 展示该方法在修订桑给巴尔基本医疗保健套餐 (2019-2022) 中的应用.

主要方法:

  • 制定了10个步骤的结构化方法,强调利益相关者的参与,透明度和审议.
  • 该方法包括路线图开发,管理,标准选择,干预识别,融资,证据生成,分析,优先级,实施以及M&E.
  • 建立共识的研讨会被用来确定确定优先级的标准,包括成本效益,预算影响,疾病负担,公平性和政治可接受性.

主要成果:

  • 十步方法为资源有限的环境提供了务实的,具体的指导.
  • 在桑给巴尔确定优先级的关键标准包括成本效益,预算影响,疾病负担,公平性和政治/公众可接受性.
  • 这个过程促进了包括性,信任和合法性在基本医疗保健包修订.

结论:

  • 十步方法为决策者提供了一种有价值的工具,帮助他们设计和实施对基本卫生服务的公平和包容的优先设定流程.
  • 这种方法有助于弥合全球框架和在不同卫生系统环境中的本地实施之间的差距.