解开和纠正大学翻转教室的学生之间的自由骑行行为:一种非正常的DEMATEL方法
Shiyu Yan1, Lisheng Jiang1, Zhili Zuo1
1College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Frontiers in psychology
|June 24, 2025
概括
翻转教室的自由骑行是使用一个新的公平评估框架来量化. 这种方法使用折扣分数来确保公平,增强学生的动力,并支持可持续的大学教育.
科学领域:
- 教育技术的教育技术
- 高等教育教学的教学.
- 评估和评价的评估和评估.
背景情况:
- 翻转教室促进以学生为中心的学习,但冒着自由骑行的风险,一些学生在没有贡献的情况下受益.
- 这种自由驾驶现象造成了不公平,并阻碍了大学教育的可持续发展.
- 在翻转的教室中量化自由骑行仍然是一个未解决的挑战.
研究的目的:
- 提出和验证一个公平的评估框架,以解决学生在翻转教室的自由骑行问题.
- 开发一种方法来量化自由骑行造成的不公平.
- 确保在协作学习环境中获得公平的学术成果.
主要方法:
- 一个公平的评估框架,整合决策试验和评估实验室 (DEMATEL) 方法.
- 使用DEMATEL生成全面的学生指数.
- 根据综合指数确定集团不公平指数和学生折扣参数.
- 修改学生成绩分数使用折扣分数以确保公平性.
主要成果:
- 在大学翻转教室中证实了自由骑行行为,量化允许有针对性的干预.
- 折扣分数有效地促进公平,增强学生的动力.
- 没有发现集团分数和不公平指数之间的直接相关性.
- 一个小组的学生数量与不公平指数没有直接关联.
结论:
- 拟议的公平评估框架量化了自由骑行,促进了翻转教室中的公平性和动机.
- 该框架有助于教育管理人员评估课程的有效性,并促进可持续的大学教育.
- 该方法支持协作学习的积极发展和有效的翻转课堂实施.
更多相关视频
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.8K
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
4.1K
相关概念视频
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Social Loafing
36.2K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.2K
Naturalistic Observations
16.0K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.0K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.7K
Conformity
45.4K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.4K
Deindividuation
27.5K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
27.5K
