间接反作为识别学术不当行为的工具:医学学生之间的横截面多中心研究
Haitao Tang1,2, Xufeng Wan1, Wen Zeng3,4
1Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
BMC medical education
|July 2, 2025
概括
间接反显示,医学学生中观察到的学术不当行为的流行率为27.11%,明显高于2.71%的自我报告. 这突显了传统方法中的报告不足,并确定了针对性干预的风险群体.
科学领域:
- 医学教育研究 医学教育研究
- 学术诚信研究 学术诚信研究
- 研究伦理学研究伦理学
背景情况:
- 学术不端行为对医学教育和医疗保健构成重大威胁.
- 传统的不当行为自我报告方法受到社会可取性偏见和报告不足的限制.
- 研究了一种间接反方法,以改善对学术不当行为的评估.
研究的目的:
- 通过间接反方法评估医学教育中学术不端行为的普遍性.
- 将间接反的发现与传统的自我报告进行比较.
- 识别学术不端行为的模式和风险群体.
主要方法:
- 这是一项涉及来自五所机构的1,622名研究生医学生的横截面研究.
- 参与者填写了关于人口统计信息,观察到的不当行为和学术压力的问卷.
- 使用统计分析,包括千-平方测试,来检查关联.
主要成果:
- 27.11%的人报告观察过不当行为,而2.71%的人承认个人参与.
- 在数据收集和处理过程中最常见的不当行为.
- 男学生,高等学年,更多的出版物与报告观察到的不当行为相关联.
结论:
- 与自我报告相比,间接反显著增加了所报告的学术不端行为的普遍性.
- 这种方法提供了对不当行为模式的洞察力,并有助于制定有针对性的干预措施.
- 未来的研究应该将间接反与其他工具相结合,以加强监测和促进问责制.
更多相关视频
08:27Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
2.9K
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.7K
相关概念视频
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Feedback Inhibition
54.7K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
54.7K
Blind Procedures
12.2K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.2K
Feedback Loops
58.7K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
58.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
2.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.5K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
