相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

翻译和心理验证的芬兰版本的修订第二个受害者的经验和支持工具:一个试点研究

Sanu Mahat¹, Saija Koskiniemi², Helena Lehmusto³

¹Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1c, Kuopio, Finland. sanu.mahat@uef.fi.

|July 2, 2025

概括

第二个受害者经验和支持工具 (SVEST-R) 的芬兰版本是医疗保健专业人员的有效和可靠措施. 该工具有助于评估第二受害者现象,并支持芬兰的资源.

科学领域:

医疗保健专业人员的福祉
心理测量验证的验证方法
患者的安全性患者安全性

背景情况:

医疗保健专业人员在无意伤害后可能会经历心理痛苦,成为无意伤害者.
第二个受害者.第二个受害者.
第二个受害者经验和支持工具修订版 (SVEST-R) 评估了这些经验.

研究的目的:

将 SVEST-R 翻译成芬兰语.
评估芬兰版本 (FI-SVEST-R) 的心理测量特性和可行性.

主要方法:

使用前向和后向翻译进行横截面在线调查.
专家小组对文化适应性的审查.
确认因素分析和内部一致性测试.

主要成果:

145名芬兰医疗保健专业人员参加了会议.
这款FI-SVEST-R表现出了良好的九因素模型适合性.
麦当劳的Omega和Cronbach的alpha表示的高可靠性.

结论:

在芬兰,FI-SVEST-R是评估第二受害者经历的有效和可靠工具.
它可以为支持计划的开发和评估提供信息.
由于样本大小和项目负载,建议进行进一步的验证.

关键词:

不良事件不良事件不良事件医疗保健专业人员医疗保健专业人员药物错误是因为药物错误.患者的安全性患者安全性斯维斯特 (Svest) 是一个国家.第二个受害者是第二个受害者.第二个受害者综合征

更多相关视频

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

相关概念视频

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.