评估LGBTQ+亲密伴侣暴力的措施,使用基于共识的有效性标准
Sinéad Kelleher1, Cal De Nicolas Audoin1, Lisa Callaghan1
1School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Clinical psychology review
|July 3, 2025
概括
现有的亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 措施可能无法充分捕捉女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,跨性别者,酷尔,加 (LGBTQ+) 个人的经历. 需要进一步的研究来验证和改进这些工具对不同的人口.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷尔,加 (LGBTQ+) 个人报告的亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的比率与异性恋和 cisgender 人群相似或超过.
- 现有的标准化IPV措施可能无法完全涵盖LGBTQ+社区内IPV的独特经验.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和评估用于在LGBTQ+样本中捕获IPV的现有措施的心理测量质量.
- 发现LGBTQ+群体IPV评估工具的心理测定验证中的差距.
主要方法:
- 使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准 (COSMIN) 标准进行了系统的文献审查.
- 四个主要的学术数据库 (PubMed,PsychINFO,Cinahl,Web of Science) 进行了搜索,以确定在LGBTQ+个体中使用IPV心理测量的相关研究.
主要成果:
- 评估了42篇文章中的22个IPV自我报告措施.
- 虽然一些措施显示出良好的内部一致性和结构有效性,但许多措施缺乏强大的开发流程,内容有效性评估和测量不变性测试.
- 可靠性分析是常见的,但假设测试的质量有所不同,大多数研究中缺少不变性测试.
结论:
- 对于在LGBTQ+样本中使用的IPV测量,需要加强心理测量验证,包括有效性,可靠性和响应性的证据.
- 进一步严格的心理测试是必要的,以改善IPV评估在不同的背景和加强研究结果在这个领域.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Relationship Formation
41.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.2K
Data Validation
5.4K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
160
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
160
Couples Therapy
96
Couples therapy is a therapeutic approach designed to help individuals in intimate relationships address conflicts, improve communication, and foster healthier dynamics. It is appropriate for couples at various stages, including those who are dating, married, or in long-term partnerships, and aims to support partners in navigating their unique relational challenges.
Core Principles and Techniques
Couples therapy often incorporates cognitive-behavioral principles to identify and modify negative...
Core Principles and Techniques
Couples therapy often incorporates cognitive-behavioral principles to identify and modify negative...
96
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
697
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
697


