在中国和日本的高等教育中,口吃经验的定性比较
Chengqi He1, Kazunori Takeda2, Yu-An Chen1
1Graduate School of Human Comprehensive Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Journal of fluency disorders
|July 4, 2025
概括
在中国和日本,口吃的学生面临着类似的沟通障碍和有限的大学支持. 需要文化敏感的干预措施来应对他们在高等教育中的独特挑战.
科学领域:
- 语音和语言病理学 语言病理学
- 跨文化心理学 跨文化心理学
- 高等教育研究 高等教育研究
背景情况:
- 吃 (SWS) 对高等教育的学生来说是一个独特的挑战.
- 在不同文化背景下理解这些经验对于有效的支持至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 探索和比较中国和日本大学学生的口吃经历.
- 找出的中国和日本学生所面临的具体挑战 (SWS).
主要方法:
- 涉及11名中国和11名日本本科生SWS的定性研究.
- 半结构面试以ICF模型为指导.
- 使用NVivo软件进行反射主题分析进行分析.
主要成果:
- 五个主题出现了:沟通障碍,心理经验,公众态度,有限的支持和期望.
- 两组人都经历了沟通困难和关于口吃的负面情绪.
- 中国和日本的SWS都报告说大学支持不足,对咨询和意识的需求不同.
结论:
- 文化和社会规范在中国和日本显著地塑造了口吃的经历.
- 调查结果强调,需要对东亚的SWS进行文化响应,个性化干预.
- 当前的支持模式可能不足,需要超越简单的文化分歧.
相关概念视频
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
2.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
2.1K
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Case Studies
12.1K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.1K
Statistical Significance
20.4K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.4K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
Social Facilitation
33.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
33.0K


