Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

81.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
81.9K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

252
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
252
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.6K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

11.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
11.3K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

192
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
192
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

311
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
311

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Inflammatory Biomarkers Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in People Living With HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of the International AIDS Society·2026
Same author

The applicability to systematic reviews of common effect, random effects and fixed effects approaches to meta-analysis.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Predicting hypotension, syncope, and fracture risk in patients indicated for antihypertensive treatment: the STRATIFY models.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The importance of experience: insights into optimal home-blood pressure monitoring regimens from the TASMINH4 Trial.

Journal of hypertension·2025
Same author

Global Blood Pressure Screening During and After Pregnancy: May Measurement Month 2019.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2024
Same author

Statistical models for the deterioration of kidney function in a primary care population: A retrospective database analysis.

F1000Research·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.6K

通过可重复性和可重复性来探索肌肉反应测试准确度的变化.

Anne M Jensen1,2,3, Richard J Stevens1,2, Amanda J Burls4

  • 1Department of Continuing Professional Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

PloS one
|July 8, 2025
PubMed
概括

肌肉反应测试 (MRT) 的准确性在从业者和患者之间差异很大,超过40%的差异无法解释. 虽然在统计学上可以重复,但MRT精度的临床重复性仍然令人担忧.

更多相关视频

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles
14:02

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles

Published on: November 1, 2012

24.0K
Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients
09:44

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Published on: April 12, 2011

81.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.6K
Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles
14:02

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles

Published on: November 1, 2012

24.0K
Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients
09:44

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Published on: April 12, 2011

81.7K

科学领域:

  • 神经学 神经学
  • 诊断准确性研究 诊断准确性研究

背景情况:

  • 肌肉反应测试 (MRT) 是一种诊断工具.
  • 在MRT准确度的变化可能会影响临床效用.
  • 了解影响MRT准确性的因素至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 为了研究平均肌肉反应测试 (MRT) 准确度的变化.
  • 确定参与者的特征是否解释了观察到的MRT精度变化.

主要方法:

  • 一个前性的诊断测试准确性研究,使用一个圆形组合设计.
  • 16名从业人员使用20个MRT对7名试验患者进行了评估.
  • 分析包括差异 (ANOVA),散射图和布兰德-阿尔特曼图,以评估可重复性和可重复性.

主要成果:

  • 平均MRT精度为0.616,明显高于直观猜测 (0.507) 和机会 (p<0.01).
  • 在实践者和试验患者中观察到精度差异很大.
  • 无论是从业者还是测试患者的特征都没有预测MRT准确度 (p>0.19),其中43%的差异无法解释.

结论:

  • MRT准确度显示出显著的变异性,超过40%的不明原因变异.
  • 虽然在统计学上是可重复的,但广泛的得分范围表明临床重复性不足.
  • 需要进一步的研究来确定影响MRT准确性的因素,并提高其可靠性.