在犹不决的模糊图形模型框架内,复合决策者之间的共识稳定性,适用于医生与患者之间的纠纷
Tianming Zhang1, Dayong Wang2, Yejun Xu3
1College of Business, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, 224007, People's Republic of China.
Scientific reports
|July 9, 2025
概括
本研究介绍了使用犹模糊偏好关系 (HFPR) 解决医生与患者争端的复合决策者 (CDM). 该模型增强了群体决策中的共识和稳定性,以促进社会和.
科学领域:
- 决策科学 决策科学
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
背景情况:
- 由于社交媒体,医生与病人之间的争端正在升级,将个人冲突转化为群体问题.
- 现有的冲突解决模式与群体动态和不断变化的偏好的复杂性作斗争.
- 需要一个框架来管理争端中的多个利益相关者之间的共识和稳定性.
研究的目的:
- 在冲突解决的图形模型 (GMCR) 中,提出一种新的冲突解决框架,使用组合决策者 (CDM).
- 开发方法来表示和测量CDM之间的共识犹不决的模糊偏好关系 (HFPRs).
- 将开发的模型应用于中国的医生和患者纠纷,以促进和解和社会和.
主要方法:
- 使用犹不决的模糊偏好关系 (HFPRs) 来建模群体内的个人偏好.
- 开发基于灰色关系分析的共识测量和改进的K-means集群算法,结合社会信任.
- 采用DeGroot意见演变模型来模拟子组意见互动,并得出新的共识稳定性定义.
主要成果:
- 一种方法可以将个人HFPR转化为CDM的群组模糊偏好.
- 在犹不决的模糊图形模型结构中,对于共识稳定的新定义.
- 证明了该模型对医生和患者之间的争端的应用,有助于冲突分析和和解.
结论:
- 拟议的GMCR框架与CDM和HFPR有效地模拟复杂的群体偏好,并促进共识建设.
- 开发的共识稳定性定义为多利益相关方场景中的冲突解决提供了关键的见解.
- 该模型为决策者和政府提供了一种有价值的工具,用于管理和解决社会纠纷,例如医生和患者之间的纠纷.
相关概念视频
Ethical Dilemmas II
1.4K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.4K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
160
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
160
Cognitive Dissonance
33.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.7K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K


