一个手动的三步隐藏的个人资料分析,以发现大学生之间fhubbing风险资料
1Department of Instructional Technologies, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Frontiers in psychology
|July 10, 2025
概括
在大学生中,Phubbing或电话轻蔑很普遍,智能手机成显著增加了风险. 更高的phubbing与更大的孤独有关,但与沟通技巧或幸福感的差异无关.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 数字行为研究 数字行为研究
背景情况:
- 在大学环境中,Phubbing (电话窃听) 是一个越来越令人担忧的问题.
- 了解phubbing个人资料及其相关内容对于学生的福祉至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了在大学生中识别不同的phubbing个人资料.
- 检查影响这些个人资料的因素及其与孤独,沟通技巧和幸福的关联.
主要方法:
- 使用隐形形状分析 (LPA) 进行横截面研究.
- 样本:来自土耳其东南部的691名大学生.
- 收集了关于phubbing行为,智能手机成,孤独感,沟通技巧和幸福感的数据.
主要成果:
- 确定了三个风险概况:低风险 (67.3%),中等风险 (24%),高风险 (8.7%).
- 女性性别和更高的智能手机成显著预测了更高的phubbing风险.
- 增加的孤独与更高的风险有关;在个人资料中没有发现沟通技巧或幸福感的显著差异.
结论:
- 智能手机成是大学生fhubbing行为的一个关键驱动因素.
- 胡言乱语可能会加剧孤独感.
- 建议采取促进健康数字行为的干预措施.
更多相关视频
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.7K
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
5.5K
相关概念视频
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Social Loafing
36.1K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.1K
Deindividuation
27.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
27.4K
Group Design
9.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.7K
