Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

91.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.6K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

40.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.1K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.5K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

41.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.2K
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture01:27

Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture

96
Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
96

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Communal philosophy? A possible framework for academia-community interaction.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Correction to: Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions: introduction to the theme issue (2022) by Carmel <i>et al.</i>

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Can models of evolutionary transition clarify the debates over the Neolithic Revolution?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions: introduction to the theme issue.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Academic excellence and community relevance: Can we have it all?

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2022
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.9K

多样性是否会促进排斥?

Yael Silver1, Ayelet Shavit1

  • 1Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, 1220800, Israel; Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel.

Studies in history and philosophy of science
|July 10, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

学术界当前的多样性倡议往往会造成分歧,阻碍真正的包容和公平. 关注多样性的多样性

关键词:
这种二分法 (dichotomy) 是不同的.差异化 差异化多样性多样性多样性多样性包容性 包容性 包容性社会不公正社会不公正高等教育中的代表人数不足.

更多相关视频

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.9K
Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

科学领域:

  • 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
  • 教育教育教育教育教育教育.
  • 科学社会学科学社会学

背景情况:

  • 社会正义的努力广泛倡导科学和社会的多样性.
  • 人类的多样性通常是由指定群体的种族,种族或性别差异来定义的.
  • 预计多样性可以通过平等代表来促进包容性.

研究的目的:

  • 批判性地检查多样性如何在学术界运作.
  • 展示常见的多样性实践如何无意中造成二分歧.
  • 探索这些二分论对公平和包容性的影响.

主要方法:

  • 对多样性措施的非正式和正式含义的分析.
  • 在一个关于教育公平的学术课程中检查多样性衡量标准的使用情况.
  • 对多样性在促进包容性中的作用进行话语分析.

主要成果:

  • 多样性的操作化往往导致二分论思维.
  • 这种二分化可能会导致对代表性不足的群体的刻板印象描绘.
  • 当前的多样性做法可能会加剧代表性不足的群体面临的挑战,而不是促进包容性.

结论:

  • 促进社会正义需要包容,而包容需要多样性.
  • 然而,特定的多样性实施实践可能会造成分裂,阻碍包容.
  • 重新思考多样性方法对于真正推进学术界的社会正义和平等至关重要.