休滑板运动员的患病率和受伤概况:基于调查的横截面研究
Philippe Declève1, Geoffroy Nourissat2, Damien Neyens3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, avenue Mounier 84, 1200, Brussels, Belgium; SFMKS LAB, 14 rue de Noisy, Asnières sur oise, 95270, France.
概括
休滑板运动员的受伤率为36.5%,下肢受伤最常见. 诸如30岁以上和经验不足等因素会增加板受伤的风险.
科学领域:
- 运动医学 运动医学
- 伤害流行病学 伤害流行病学
- 帕德尔科学科学 帕德尔科学
背景情况:
- 帕德尔是快速发展的球衣运动.
- 了解伤害模式对于球员安全和体育发展至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了确定休板球运动员的受伤率和个人资料.
- 为了确定与伤害相关的球员和板相关的因素.
主要方法:
- 跨截面,基于调查的回顾性研究.
- 来自比利时俱乐部的457名休成人板球运动员填写了调查问卷.
- 进行了单变量和多变量分析.
主要成果:
- 观察到的整体伤害率为每1000个比赛小时2.81.
- 最常见的是下肢受伤 (53.5%).
- 独立的受伤风险因素包括30岁以上的年龄,失眠,缺乏经验,在右边打球,以及不打其他球拍运动.
结论:
- 帕德尔伤害发生率和个人资料与其他球衣运动相一致.
- 女性性别与较高的受伤风险无关.
- 需要进行进一步的研究,以确定已识别的玩家和板相关因素的因果关系.
相关概念视频
01:08Prevalence and Incidence
825
In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
825
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
695
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
695