相关实验视频
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

11:41
Magnetic Tweezers for the Measurement of Twist and Torque
Published on: May 19, 2014
23.4K
在高精度球形近场天线测量中对机械对齐错误的模式不确定性的准确和快速数值估计
Kyriakos Kaslis1, Samel Arslanagic1, Olav Breinbjerg2
1Department of Space Research and Technology, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 12, 2025
概括
从机械对齐错误中估计天线模式的不确定性是耗时的. 本研究介绍了一种使用单个测量的数值方法,节省时间和资源,同时隔离错误贡献.
科学领域:
- 电磁学 电磁学 电磁学 电磁学
- 计量学 计量学 计量学
- 天线理论天线理论
背景情况:
- 实验测量本质上具有不确定性,由于各种错误来源.
- 准确的不确定性估计对于高精度的球形近场天线测量至关重要.
- 机械对齐错误对天线模式的不确定性有很大影响,传统估计是资源密集的.
研究的目的:
- 开发一种时间效率高的数值方法,用于估计由机械对齐错误引起的模式不确定性.
- 消除需要单独,耗时的不确定性测量.
- 为了使单个机械对齐错误贡献的隔离.
主要方法:
- 作为数值不确定性估计的基础,使用了名义全球测量.
- 拟议的方法避免了对单独的不确定性测量活动的要求.
- 该技术允许单个错误源影响的解卷.
主要成果:
- 介绍了一种新的数值方法,用于在天线测量中估计模式不确定性.
- 该方法显著减少了不确定性分析所需的时间和资源.
- 机械对齐错误对整体模式不确定性的个人贡献可以量化.
结论:
- 数字不确定性估计为机械对齐错误提供了比传统实验方法更有效的替代方案.
- 这种方法简化了天线计量学中不确定性评估过程.
- 隔离错误源的能力提高了理解,并促进了有针对性的改进.
相关概念视频
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
81.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
81.6K
Adjusting a Traverse
104
In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
104
Random and Systematic Errors
12.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
45.8K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
45.8K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
128
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
128
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
779
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
779

