Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

307
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
307
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

695
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
695
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

262
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
262
Bias01:22

Bias

5.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
5.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Likelihood ratios of quantitative diagnostic test results.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2026
Same author

Interpreting two test results of one analyte from the same individual using bivariate reference values.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2026
Same author

Divide or subtract: transferrin saturation versus unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC).

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2026
Same author

Testing MMA<sub>100</sub> - the eGFR-adjusted concentration of methylmalonic acid in plasma.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2025
Same author

Stability of 17 endocrine analytes in serum or plasma after four cycles of repeated freezing and thawing.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2025
Same author

Three new tools to diagnose B12 deficiency: eGFR-adjusted methylmalonic acid (MMA<sub>100</sub>), a bivariate reference area for MMA<sub>100</sub> and cobalamin, and a cobalamin deficiency index.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

不完美的参考标准会导致偏差的概率比率.

Arne Åsberg1, Ann Elisabeth Åsberg1,2

  • 1Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation
|July 12, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

不完美的参考标准可能会影响诊断生物标志物的准确性. 这项研究表明,对S-转林和等生物标志物的概率比率 (LRs) 在诊断铁缺乏症等疾病时可能会严重误导.

关键词:
诊断的准确性 诊断的准确性不完美的参考标准是不完美的缺铁症是因为缺铁.可能性比率的概率.接收器运行特征 (ROC) 曲线转氨酸和度转氨酸和度

更多相关视频

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

535

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

535

科学领域:

  • 生物标志物的发现和验证.
  • 诊断测试的准确性 诊断测试的准确性
  • 医学统计数据 医学统计数据

背景情况:

  • 定量生物标志物对于疾病诊断至关重要.
  • 诊断准确性依赖于可靠的参考标准.
  • 不完美的参考标准可以在生物标志物评估中引入偏见.

研究的目的:

  • 调查不完美的参考标准对诊断生物标志物准确性的影响.
  • 在各种疾病流行率和生物标志物参考标准相关性场景下量化概率比率 (LRs) 的偏差.
  • 以铁缺乏症诊断为例,评估这种偏差的临床意义.

主要方法:

  • 利用模拟数据集来建模生物标志物度和参考标准分类.
  • 多样化的疾病患病率和生物标志物与不完美的参考标准之间的相关性.
  • 分析了估计的接收机操作特征 (ROC) 曲线和概率比 (LRs) 的结果偏差.

主要成果:

  • 不完美的参考标准显然会导致概率比率 (LRs) 的估计产生偏差.
  • 偏差的程度受疾病患病率和生物标志物与参考标准之间的相关性影响.
  • 铁缺乏症诊断中S-转林和量的估计LR被证明是潜在的偏差在临床上显著的方式.

结论:

  • 使用不完美的参考标准可能会导致对生物标志物的诊断实用性的误导性结论.
  • 在评估定量生物标志物时,必须仔细考虑参考标准质量.
  • 调查结果强调需要强大的验证方法,以确保可靠的诊断生物标志物评估.