主观评价的可靠性在评估精英乒乓球运动员的表现时
Lulu Gan1, Jing Chen2, Luning Wang3
1China Table Tennis College, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Frontiers in psychology
|July 15, 2025
概括
专家乒乓球观察员表现出可靠的个人绩效评估,但观察员之间的一致性很低. 主观评估的一致性取决于信息可用性和观察者的专业知识,专家表示更高的同意.
科学领域:
- 运动科学 运动科学 运动科学
- 发动机控制器的控制器
- 专家的表现 专家的表现
背景情况:
- 主观评价对于精英体育的表现分析至关重要.
- 观察员的专业知识和信息条件可以影响这些评估的可靠性.
- 了解影响一致性的因素是提高乒乓球评估准确性的关键.
研究的目的:
- 评估精英乒乓球运动员主观绩效评估的可靠性.
- 调查两个信息条件 (有/没有结果) 对评估一致性的影响.
- 探索观察者专业知识如何影响绩效评估的一致性.
主要方法:
- 不同专业的观察员评估了卓球球员的拉力击.
- 一个视频掩饰范式隐藏了关键的运动信息.
- 权重卡帕 (k) 和肯德尔一致系数 (w) 测量了观察者之间的一致性.
主要成果:
- 观察者内部可靠性很好 (r = 0.61-0.86),但观察者之间的一致性很低 (k = 0.01-0.39).
- 当动力学信息被遮蔽 (没有结果) 时,一致性下降.
- 专家观察员在所有评估指标上表现出较高的一致性,与高级和初学者观察员相比.
结论:
- 乒乓球的主观评价显示观察者内部可靠性很高,但观察者之间的一致性很低.
- 信息条件显著影响评估的一致性,更多的数据导致更高的协议.
- 观察员的专业知识是一个关键因素,更高的技能水平与绩效评估中的更大一致性有关.
相关概念视频
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Trait and State Self-Esteem
11.0K
The term self-esteem is often used generically, to refer to how people feel about themselves. However, according to research, there are three distinct constructs that should not be used interchangeably (Brown & Marshall, 2006).
11.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K


