Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

292
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
292
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.0K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.7K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

13.8K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
13.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.6K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Depression severity and efficacy outcomes: post hoc analyses from a phase 3 trial of esmethadone for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder with inadequate response to standard antidepressants.

International clinical psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Graph Based, Adaptive, Multiarm, Multiple Endpoint, Two-Stage Designs.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Testing One Primary and Two Secondary Endpoints in a Two-Stage Group Sequential Trial With Extensions.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Efficacy and safety of asunercept, a CD95L-selective inhibitor, in hospitalised patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: ASUNCTIS, a multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 2 trial.

EClinicalMedicine·2024
Same author

Optimal adaptive promising zone designs.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

A simulation-based comparison of estimation methods for adaptive and classical group sequential clinical trials.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2021
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

适应式多臂两阶段设计的两种方法的比较

Cyrus Mehta1,2, Martin Kappler1

  • 1Cytel Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Statistics in medicine
|July 15, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究比较了分析组序列随机临床试验的两种方法. 与p值组合方法相比,条件错误率方法提供了更大的统计能力来识别有效的治疗方法.

关键词:
适应性设计是适应性的设计.有条件的错误率 条件错误率累积的MAMS是指MAMS的累积数量.一个顺序的群组顺序.多次测试多次测试多次测试对样本大小进行重新估计.按阶段进行的MAMS.强有力的控制家庭的错误率.

更多相关视频

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 临床试验设计 临床试验设计
  • 统计方法 统计方法

背景情况:

  • 组序列随机临床试验允许进行中间分析和适应性设计修改.
  • 将多个处理臂与一个共同的控制器进行比较需要强大的统计方法来保持错误率.

研究的目的:

  • 评估和比较两种统计方法来分析两阶段组顺序随机临床试验.
  • 评估p值组合方法和条件错误率方法在控制家族智能错误率 (FWER) 和最大化统计功能的性能.

主要方法:

  • 该研究考虑了两阶段的组序列设计,其中包括自适应性样本大小调整和临时手臂下降.
  • 两个方法,p值组合和条件错误率,在理论上进行了讨论,并使用模拟研究进行了比较.
  • 在这两种程序中,控制了家庭智能错误率 (FWER).

主要成果:

  • 无论是p值组合方法还是条件错误率方法,都有效控制了家庭智能错误率 (FWER).
  • 与p值组合方法相比,条件错误率方法在各种场景和替代假设中显示出更高的统计能力.

结论:

  • 条件错误率方法是一种更强大的方法,用于在两阶段组顺序随机临床试验中确定有效的治疗方法.
  • 这些发现表明,应考虑使用条件错误率方法,因为它在保持统计严格的同时提高了检测治疗效应的能力.