相对错觉是语言理解中的理性推断的证据
Yuhan Zhang1, Carina Kauf2, Roger P Levy2
1Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
Journal of experimental psychology. General
|July 21, 2025
概括
人们常常发现语义上异常的"比较幻觉"句子是可以接受的. 这项研究使用噪音通道框架和理性推理来解释这种语言错觉,显示解释概率与生产概率相关.
科学领域:
- 心理语言学 心理语言学
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 计算语言学 计算语言学
背景情况:
- 非语法或语义上不可信的句子可以被认为是可以接受的.
- "比较错觉" (CI) 描述了人们如何接受语义上异常的句子,比如'比我去过俄罗斯的人更多'.
研究的目的:
- 使用噪音通道框架来解释"比较幻觉" (CI).
- 调查理解者如何对具有潜在生产错误的句子做出理性推断.
主要方法:
- 确定了一个语言构造,引起了突出的CI幻觉.
- 确定了CI句子的可信解释范围.
- 实验测试了解释概率和生产错误可能性之间的关系.
主要成果:
- 对CI句子赋予可信解释的概率与其在噪音通信中产生的概率成比例.
- 理解者根据潜在的生产错误进行"接近"的合理解释.
- 发现一种特定的语言结构可靠地引起CI效应.
结论:
- "比较幻觉"可以通过在噪音频道框架内的理性推断来解释.
- 语言理解包括从可能错误的发言中推断出预期的含义.
- 这项研究支持噪音通道推断在理解语言中的作用.
更多相关视频
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
15.8K
06:15Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
7.8K
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
11.3K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.3K
Language and Cognition
448
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
448
Reason and Intuition
6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Inductive Reasoning
62.9K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
62.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K
