专家共识和德尔菲研究要求列出共识小组的列表,用于由他们的指导委员会指定的贡献作者
概括
专家共识研究中的作者需要明确的指导方针. 应该指定一个指导委员会作为作者,并单独承认整个小组.
科学领域:
- 医学出版的伦理 医学出版的伦理
- 科学传播是科学传播.
背景情况:
- 专家的共识和德尔菲研究面临着独特的作者挑战.
- 区分作者和贡献者至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 澄清专家共识和德尔菲研究的作者准则.
- 提出一个实用的方法来承认大型专家小组.
- 为了符合已确立的出版道德标准.
主要方法:
- 审查道德机构的作者标准和指导方针.
- 在专家共识研究出版物中分析常见实践.
- 关于为贡献者提供分层确认系统的建议.
主要成果:
- 指导委员会被确定为主要作者,符合作者标准.
- 专家小组成员被单独承认,而不是作为共同作者.
- PubMed的名称包括"德尔菲小组"或"德尔菲共识小组"以及其附属机构.
结论:
- 需要明确区分作者和公认的贡献者.
- 指定一个指导委员会作为作者确保了问责制和清晰度.
- 这种方法平衡了作者标准与共识研究的协作性质.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Deductive Reasoning
59.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
59.5K
The Scientific Method
246.6K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
246.6K
Study Design in Statistics
8.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.5K
Inductive Reasoning
62.9K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
62.9K


