医学引用不准确性的系统审查和元分析
Christopher Baethge1,2, Hannah Jergas3
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany. cbaethge@uni-koeln.de.
医学文献中的引用错误仍然很高,其中16.9%的引用是不准确的. 尽管它们很重要,但科学准确性并没有随着时间的推移而得到改善,因此需要更好的学术和编辑实践.
科学领域:
- 医学文献分析 医学文献分析
- 科学传播的准确性 科学传播的准确性
- 学术出版的诚信学术出版的诚信
背景情况:
- 引用在科学话语中至关重要,但往往含有不准确的内容.
- 引用错误,即引用不支持主张的引用错误,是医学写作中持续存在的问题.
研究的目的:
- 调查医学文献中引用错误的流行情况.
- 分析医学研究中的引用精度随时间的变化趋势.
主要方法:
- 在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中进行系统搜索.
- 46项研究的元分析和元回归,涉及超过32,000个引用.
- 两个评级人员独立提取数据并进行偏差风险评估.
主要成果:
- 发现所有报价中的16.9%是不正确的,其中8.0%被归类为重大错误.
- 近年来,没有观察到报价准确性的显著改善.
- 期刊影响因子与总错误率有显著的负相关性.
结论:
- 引用错误在医学文献中仍然是一个重大问题.
- 随着时间的推移,报价的准确性没有明显改善.
- 改善学术实践和编辑监督对于解决这个问题至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:18Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
Published on: April 26, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
相关概念视频
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Random and Systematic Errors
