自由派和保守派在社交媒体上分享信息的方式不同
Ho-Chun Herbert Chang1, James N Druckman2, Emilio Ferrara3,4
1Program in Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
PNAS nexus
|July 23, 2025
概括
自由派在社交媒体上分享的政治内容比保守派更多样化,更有毒. 这项研究分析了美国国会成员在Twitter上共享的数百万条消息,以了解内容传播中的意识形态差异.
科学领域:
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 社交媒体平台使政客和公民之间的直接沟通成为可能.
- 公民是政治信息在线传播的关键因素.
- 了解内容共享的意识形态差异对于政治传播研究至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查保守派和自由派公民在分享政治家社交媒体内容的选择中是否存在差异.
- 分析不同政治意识形态在社交媒体上分享的问题和内容毒性的广度.
主要方法:
- 分析了超过1300万用户在Twitter上分享来自美国国会成员的1,293,753条消息 (2009-2019).
- 利用政治意识形态的估计,从超过35亿之前的回复推文中得出.
- 使用标准分类器来评估共享内容的毒性.
主要成果:
- 与保守派相比,自由主义者转发了涵盖更广泛问题的声明.
- 自由主义者分享了内容被评为相对更有毒的声明.
- 结果表明,由于政治同性恋,自由主义者可能会接触到来自民选代表的更多多样化和有毒的内容.
结论:
- 意识形态差异极大地影响了社交媒体上政治内容的消费和传播.
- 调查结果突出了不同意识形态群体内政治两极分化和信息曝光的潜在影响.
- 需要进一步的研究来探索这些观察到的内容共享模式的基础解释.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
09:40Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
Published on: November 15, 2014
13.9K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
35.6K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.6K
Social Proof
28.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.6K
Conservative Forces
12.5K
According to the law of conservation of energy, any transition between kinetic and potential energy conserves the total energy of the system. Hence, the work done by a conservative force is completely reversible. It is path independent, which means that we can start and stop at any two points in the transition, and the total energy of the system (kinetic plus potential energy at these points) will remain conserved. This is characteristic of a conservative force. Some important examples of...
12.5K
Relationship Formation
41.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.1K
Social Exchange Theory
35.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
35.5K
In- and Out-Groups
40.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.1K
