通过顺序协作最小化社会偏见:贡献者特征在依赖性判断中的作用
Maren Mayer1, Joachim Kimmerle2,3
1Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (Knowledge Media Research Center), Schleichstraße 6, 76072, Tübingen, Germany. maren.mayer@iwm-tuebingen.de.
Scientific reports
|July 24, 2025
概括
在线项目中的顺序协作能够抵御社会影响,即使提供了有关之前贡献者的信息. 这种方法被证明是准确可靠的判断聚合的有效方法,防止偏见.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 人与计算机的交互
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
背景情况:
- 顺序协作涉及多个贡献者连续调整条目.
- 这种方法对准确的数值判断聚合有希望.
- 关于以前的贡献者信息对后续判断的影响还不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 调查所呈现的社会信息 (专业知识,性别,团体成员资格) 对参与者在顺序协作中的行为的影响.
- 专门检查之前参与者的专业知识对判断聚合的影响.
- 评估顺序协作对抗社会影响的稳定性.
主要方法:
- 三个实验 (N=85,186,302) 测试了所呈现的专业知识,性别和团体成员身份对变化概率和规模的影响.
- 另外两项实验 (N=538,878) 专注于之前参与者的专业知识的影响.
- 在不同的实验条件下分析了对判断变化的行为数据.
主要成果:
- 在最初的实验中,没有发现所呈现的专业知识,性别或团体成员身份对判断变化的显著影响.
- 实验2也没有发现以前参与者的专业知识的影响.
- 实验3揭示了专业知识的统计学上显著但实际上很小的影响,低于最小的感兴趣效应大小.
结论:
- 顺序协作对简单的社会影响表现出相当大的稳定性,支持其用于判断聚合的使用.
- 这些发现突出了顺序协作作为一个潜在的可靠和偏见预防方法,协作在线项目.
- 这项研究有助于优化协作流程,以提高准确性和可靠性.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Hindsight Biases
3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.9K
Confirmation Biases
7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Attribution Theory
13.4K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.2K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.2K


