Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

9.0K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
9.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

176
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
176
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

422
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
422
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

289
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
289
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Implications and the TaPL AF Study Design.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same author

Association of Obesity With Mortality and Bleeding in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2026
Same author

Intermediate-dose anticoagulation in COVID-19: closing the loop on a long-settled question.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026
Same author

A simple score to identify the sickest normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

ERJ open research·2026
Same author

Pulmonary embolism epidemiology: trends, risk factors, comorbidities, and clinical implications.

European heart journal·2026
Same author

Development and external validation of an international score to predict cancer 1 year after venous thromboembolism.

European journal of internal medicine·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

使用随机试验和观察研究进行的比较有效性研究:有效性和可行性考虑.

Behnood Bikdeli1,2,3, Joseph S Ross3,4, Syed Bukhari5

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Thrombosis and haemostasis
|July 28, 2025
PubMed
概括

确保比较有效性研究 (CER) 的有效性是关键. 本综述讨论了在研究设计中平衡内部,构造和外部有效性,并使用了血栓瘤研究的例子.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

706
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

706
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

科学领域:

  • 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学

背景情况:

  • 比较有效性研究 (CER) 需要严格的验证才能获得可靠的结果.
  • 内部,构造和外部有效性是CER研究设计的关键组成部分.
  • 不同的研究设计,从双盲随机试验到观察性研究,存在独特的有效性挑战.

研究的目的:

  • 在CER中审查内部,构造和外部有效性的关键方面.
  • 讨论关于有效性的不同研究设计之间的权衡.
  • 以血栓瘤研究为例,突出了在观察性CER研究中增强有效性的方法.

主要方法:

  • 该审查综合了关于CER有效性的现有知识.
  • 它对比了双盲RCT,实用RCT和观察性研究的优点和局限性.
  • 讨论了在观察性 CER 中减轻混和增强构造有效性的方法.

主要成果:

  • 双盲RCT在内部有效性方面表现出色,但外部有效性有限.
  • 实用RCT提供了更好的概括性,但可能会牺牲内部有效性.
  • 观察性研究,包括目标试验模拟,提供高的外部有效性和可行性,但需要谨慎的方法来解决混.

结论:

  • 平衡内部,构造和外部有效性对于强大的CER至关重要.
  • 诸如倾向得分匹配,伪造测试和准实验设计等技术可以提高观察性研究的有效性.
  • 准确的患者概况和计算表型对于在观察性CER中构建有效性至关重要.