对象关系的心理测量属性Rotter的尺度 在住院患者样本中,不完整的句子空白
John Rucker1,2, Benjamin Berry1,3, Katrina Rufino1,3,4
1Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Journal of personality assessment
|July 31, 2025
概括
对于Rotter不完整句子空白 (RISB) 的新对象关系 (OR) 尺度显示了混合的心理测量结果. 虽然分层之间的可靠性很高,但子尺度的内部一致性很低,这质疑了它们的独立使用.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 临床心理学 临床心理学
背景情况:
- 对象关系 (OR) 理论对于理解人格发展至关重要.
- 罗特不完整句子空白 (RISB) 是一种广泛使用的投影测试.
- 鲁克和克里什纳穆蒂 (2023) 最近为RISB开发的OR尺度需要心理测量评估.
研究的目的:
- 检查新的RISB对象关系 (OR) 尺度的心理特征.
- 评估因素结构,内部可靠性和标准有效性.
- 在精神病医院住院患者群体中评估尺度的实用性.
主要方法:
- 使用确认因素分析来评估因子结构.
- 评估了评分器间的可靠性,内部一致性 (Cronbach's alpha) 和构造有效性.
- 使用已建立的对象关系措施和诊断组来评估标准的有效性.
主要成果:
- 一个双因素模型显示出比一个单因素模型更好的匹配,但都不是一个很好的匹配.
- 在所有OR尺度 (自我表示,他人表示,总体) 中,评价者间的可靠性是很好的.
- 内部一致性对于总OR尺度 (α = .72) 是可以接受的,但对于子尺度 (α = .67和α = .58) 是不理想的.
- 构造有效性显示了一些预期的趋同和意想不到的分歧.
- 在有或没有人格障碍的住院患者之间发现了显著的群体差异.
结论:
- 在RISB或尺度表明混合的心理测量支持.
- 优秀的间可靠性是它的优势.
- 亚尺度内部一致性是一个重要的限制,引发了人们对它们作为独立工具的使用的担忧.
- 建议对RISB OR尺度进行进一步的改进或重新评估.
相关概念视频
Self-Report Tests of Personality
455
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
455
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
44.5K
Attachment is a long-standing connection or bond with others. While Attachment Theory was conceived in developmental psychology to describe infant-caregiver bonding, it's been extended into adulthood to include romantic relationships.
44.5K
Naturalistic Observations
15.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.9K


