Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

161
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
161
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Timing of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy Resumption Following Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026
Same author

Tumor cells metabolically resist immune-checkpoint therapy by macrophage efferocytosis-mediated fatty acid recycling.

Cancer cell·2026
Same author

Engineered CRISPR/Cas12a2 Nanoprobe Imaging in Living Cells for Precise Tumor Diagnosis.

Small methods·2026
Same author

Rethinking bioinformatics expertise in the era of artificial intelligence.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Large Language Models and Their Applications in Mental Health: Scoping Review.

JMIR mental health·2026
Same author

Integrating non-neonatal tetanus vaccination into an emergency department rabies PEP clinic: Real-world workload, documentation gaps, and VAERS-informed observation priorities.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

682

一个六层框架来评估AI模型,从可重复性到可替换性.

Siqi Tian1, Alicia Wan Yu Lam1, Joseph Jao-Yiu Sung1

  • 1Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Trends in biotechnology
|August 1, 2025
PubMed
概括

一个新的六层框架增强了人工智能 (AI) 在医学和生物技术方面的评估. 这种AI评估工具可确保复杂模型的安全性,有效性和通用性,促进可靠的AI应用.

关键词:
人工智能的人工智能是人工智能.数据科学数据科学机器学习是机器学习.模型评价模型评价坚固性 坚固性 坚固性

更多相关视频

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

579
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

682
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

579
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.6K

科学领域:

  • 生物医学和健康信息学
  • 人工智能在医学中的应用
  • 生物技术 人工智能应用

背景情况:

  • 人工智能 (AI) 正在彻底改变生物技术和医学,并提出了重大评估挑战.
  • 传统的指标不足以评估复杂的AI,特别是生成模型,在高风险的生物医学应用中.
  • 可靠性和适应性对于在医疗保健和生命科学中部署人工智能至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 引入一个新的六层框架来评估生物医学和生物技术中的AI系统.
  • 为复杂和生成AI模型解决当前评估指标的局限性.
  • 促进开发可靠,负责任和有效的医疗保健人工智能解决方案.

主要方法:

  • 提出了一个六层评估框架,包括可重复性,可重复性,强度,刚性,可重复使用性和可替换性.
  • 定义了明确的标准和可操作的测试方法,每个级别,借鉴现有的文献.
  • 将框架应用于涉及诊断AI和医疗大语言模型 (LLM) 的案例研究.

主要成果:

  • 该框架为AI评估提供了一个结构化的方法,从基本一致性到部署准备性.
  • 证明了框架对传统和生成AI模型的适用性.
  • 案例研究说明了该框架在提高AI可信度和医疗应用中的问责制方面的实用性.

结论:

  • 拟议的六层框架为评估生物医学和生物技术中的AI提供了一个全面的方法.
  • 它增强了对人工智能安全性,有效性和通用性的评估,特别是在先进模型中.
  • 该框架支持将人工智能负责任地整合到临床实践和生命科学研究中.