转化障碍的因果信念:一个横截面研究
1Centre for Clinical Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
|August 2, 2025
概括
患者,护理人员和公众之间对转化障碍的因果信念有所不同. 患有转化障碍的患者对有关其原因的神话和事实表示更高的同意.
科学领域:
- 精神病学和心理学 精神病学和心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 转化障碍是一种复杂的疾病,往往缺乏明确的病因学理解.
- 关于转化障碍的原因的信念可以影响患者的结果和治疗坚持.
研究的目的:
- 调查和比较有关转化障碍的因果信念.
- 在三个不同的群体中检查这些信仰:患者,他们的照顾者和公众.
主要方法:
- 这是一项涉及300名参与者 (100名患者,100名护理人员,100名普通公众) 的横截面定量研究.
- 使用人口调查问卷和转化障碍因果信念问卷收集的数据.
- 使用SPSS 24进行的统计分析.
主要成果:
- 在所有组中都发现了心理,体质,社会文化,人际关系和超自然信仰的显著差异.
- 与照顾者 (B组) 和公众 (C组) 相比,患有转化障碍的患者 (A组) 与大多数信仰领域的同意程度更高.
- 在护理人员和公众之间,在心理因素,社会文化事实和人际神话方面,注意到了特定的差异.
结论:
- 关于转化障碍的因果信念并不统一,并且在患者,护理人员和普通人群中存在显著差异.
- 被诊断为转化障碍的患者表现出更广泛地接受他们病情的实际和神话解释.
- 了解这些不同的信仰对于开发有针对性的心理教育干预至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.3K
06:43The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
Published on: July 26, 2013
16.2K
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
11.3K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.3K
Cognitive Dissonance
33.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.6K
The Scientific Method
61.9K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
61.9K
Confirmation Biases
7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
648
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
648
Beck's Cognitive Therapy
109
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
109
