出版商对公布研究的完整性担忧的回应不一致. 证据和建议的改善措施
Andrew Grey1, Alison Avenell2, Alan Gaby3
1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Journal of clinical epidemiology
|August 6, 2025
概括
出版商对研究完整性问题的反应不一致,缓慢和不透明的流程是常见的. 解决这些差异对于提高科学文献的可信度至关重要.
科学领域:
- 图书计量和学术出版
- 研究诚信和研究道德
背景情况:
- 对于研究完整性的担忧经常与期刊出版商提出.
- 现有证据表明,出版商对这些问题的回应往往是缓慢的,不完整的,缺乏透明度.
研究的目的:
- 审查和分析出版商对研究完整性问题的回应.
- 评论这些出版商回复的一致性和有效性.
主要方法:
- 关于出版商对完整性问题的反应现有文献的叙事审查.
- 分析出版商对来自单个研究小组的172项临床试验出版物的完整性问题提出的回应.
主要成果:
- 出版商对完整性问题的反应在各个学科中始终是缓慢,不完整和不透明的.
- 对172篇临床试验出版物的分析显示,解决时间和结果非常多样,从不采取任何行动到完全撤回.
结论:
- 出版商对研究完整性问题的回应在时机和编辑决策方面明显不一致.
- 提高出版商评估的及时性,透明度和系统性对于提高发表的研究可靠性至关重要.
- 参与出版商和学术专家的合作和透明流程可以解决不一致性,提高文献可信度.
相关概念视频
Bias
4.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.9K
Confirmation Biases
7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Ethics in Research
24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
2.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.3K
Feedback Inhibition
54.6K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
54.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
290
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
290


