Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

683
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
683
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.5K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

3.8K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
3.8K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

262
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
262

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

PDA (Privacy-Preserving Distributed Algorithms) in action: ten principles for high-quality multi-site clinical evidence generation.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Real-world performance of large-scale propensity score adjustment strategies: Matching, weighting, and stratification.

Research square·2026
Same author

Superior hypogastric plexus block - Transdiscal approach.

Interventional pain medicine·2026
Same author

A comparison of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and Observational Medical Mutcomes Partnership electronic health record data within the All of Us Research Program.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Reconciling fast Hepatitis B evolutionary rates with ancient co-divergence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Navigating the landscape of novel meshes: comprehensive review of physicomechanical categorization of mesh for hernia repair.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

用小样本大小评估共变平衡的方法

George Hripcsak1,2,3, Linying Zhang2,4, Yong Chen2,5,6,7

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Statistics in medicine
|August 7, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

倾向性得分调整诊断可以错误地标志研究由于机会不平衡而有偏见. 一种新的诊断方法通过测试标准化平均差异是否在统计学上超过值来提高准确性,从而提高了对元分析中的偏差检测.

关键词:
混是一种混.共同变量平衡 共同变量平衡这是一个元分析.观察性研究是观察性研究.倾向性得分是指倾向性得分.

更多相关视频

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

科学领域:

  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 健康研究方法 卫生研究方法

背景情况:

  • 倾向得分调整方法,如匹配,分层和权衡平衡共变量,以解决混.
  • 标准诊断,如标准化平均差异 (SMD) 值,评估共变量平衡,但在较小的研究中可能过于敏感.
  • 机会失衡可能被错误地识别为显著偏差,特别是在日益精确的元分析中.

研究的目的:

  • 为了应对因机会失衡而导致的倾向性得分诊断中的膨胀的1型错误率的挑战.
  • 提出和评估一种新的诊断方法来评估倾向性得分调整中的共变量平衡.
  • 确保在元分析中诊断评估的可靠性,在这些分析中,影响估计变得更加精确.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一种替代诊断方法,以统计测试标准化平均差异 (SMD) 是否明显超过预定义的值.
  • 通过模拟和现实世界的数据,通过各种样本大小 (250-4000) 和共变量数量 (20-100,000) 评估拟议的诊断.
  • 在1型错误率和统计能力方面,将新诊断器的性能与标准名义值测试和没有测试进行了比较.

主要成果:

  • 与标准方法相比,提出的诊断方法显示了1型错误率和统计能力之间的优越权衡.
  • 这种改进的表现在广泛的样本大小和共同变量数量中是一致的.
  • 在网络研究中,对诊断的元分析至关重要,以防止从压倒性的效果估计中系统地产生混.

结论:

  • 这种新型诊断方法在倾向得分调整中提供了更准确的对共变量平衡的评估,减轻了机会失衡的问题.
  • 这种方法提高了诊断的严格性,特别是在元分析和网络研究中,通过确保准确可靠的偏见评估.
  • 该程序支持对众多共变量进行全面审查,从而使研究评估更为稳健.