相关实验视频
Updated: Sep 12, 2025
06:48
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
4.7K
在有孩子的家庭中测量可靠的互联网连接:美国国家调查的二次分析
Tran T Doan1, Kelsey A Schweiberger2, Samuel R Wittman2
1Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045-2570, United States, 1 3037245050.
Journal of medical Internet research
|August 8, 2025
概括
19%的有孩子的家庭面临不可靠的互联网,这影响了儿科的数字健康访问. 这种数字沟与互联网计划或设备所有权是分开的,影响了公平的医疗保健服务.
科学领域:
- 数字健康数字健康
- 健康 公平 卫生 公平
- 儿科护理 儿科护理
背景情况:
- 可靠的互联网对于儿科数字医疗保健和远程医疗参与至关重要.
- 缺乏连续的互联网接入是儿童远程医疗服务的重要障碍.
- 现有的调查往往忽视了互联网的可靠性,而是关注计划或设备的所有权.
研究的目的:
- 确定有孩子的家庭中可靠的互联网连接的普遍性.
- 调查可靠的互联网连接和数字技术访问之间的关联.
- 探索可靠的互联网连接和社会人口统计因素之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 关于儿童健康的美国国家横截面家长调查的二次分析.
- 专注于与可靠的互联网连接,数字技术访问和社会人口统计相关的调查项目.
- 使用后勤回归与抽样权重来分析关联,通过自我报告的互联网担忧或经验来定义不可靠的连接.
主要成果:
- 19%的有孩子的家庭报告说,互联网连接不可靠 (互联网担心或不可靠的经验).
- 可靠的互联网连接与拥有移动和非移动计划,高等教育,就业,非边缘化地位和缺乏残疾有关.
- 设备所有权,地理区域,种族/种族和父母的性别与可靠的互联网连接没有显著联系.
结论:
- 五分之一的有孩子的家庭经历了不可靠的互联网,这是数字健康差距的一个关键方面.
- 可靠的互联网连接是公平的儿科医疗保健获取和提供的关键指标.
- 需要进一步的研究,以达成共识,以衡量可靠的互联网连接作为一个独特的指标.
相关概念视频
02:01Group Design
9.6K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.6K
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
01:28Survey Safety
148
Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
148
02:16Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
01:29Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
01:07Data Collection by Survey
7.0K
The systematic method of obtaining and analyzing accurate information of a population is called data collection. A survey is a standard method of data collection that involves collecting information from a target human population about their experience, opinion, or knowledge of a product, service, or process. The responses are recorded and interpreted. The most common survey examples are written questionnaires, face-to-face or telephonic conversations, focus groups, and electronic (e-mail or...
7.0K