在大学生中调查phubbing行为:一个潜伏的个人资料分析研究研究
Faruk Caner Yam1, Yasin Demir2, Abdullah Manap3
1Faculty of Education, Guidance and Psychological Counseling Program, Tokat Gazisomanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye. farukcaneryam@hotmail.com.
BMC psychology
|August 9, 2025
概括
大学学生表现出不同的phubbing行为档案,受到自尊和社会焦虑的影响. 低自尊和更高的社会焦虑与增加的风险有关,影响数字互动.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 大学学生的身份发展和社会需求至关重要.
- 不适应的智能手机使用,包括phubbing,可能源于未得到满足的心理社会需求.
- 打电话 (Phubbing) 是一种在社交环境中普遍存在的行为.
研究的目的:
- 为了识别大学学生的phubbing行为潜伏的个人资料.
- 为了检查自尊,社会焦虑,在线感知到真实的自我和phubbing之间的关系.
- 为了确定影响风险水平的因素.
主要方法:
- 隐藏的个人资料分析以识别基于phubbing的学生群体.
- 单向ANOVA和后勤回归来分析影响因素.
- 从550名大学生收集的数据使用了经过验证的尺度.
主要成果:
- 确定了三个不同的风险概况:高,中等和低.
- 自尊,社会焦虑,在线感知到真正的自我,以及日常使用智能手机显著预测了phubbing风险.
- 高风险的个体更多地参与数字互动;低风险的个体有更高的自尊和更低的社会焦虑.
结论:
- 大学学生之间的博行为是异质的,具有可识别的风险概况.
- 心理社会因素,如自尊和社会焦虑,在phubbing中发挥着重要作用.
- 研究结果为针对性干预和未来关于问题性智能手机使用的研究提供了洞察力.
相关概念视频
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Deindividuation
27.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
27.2K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Social Loafing
35.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K


