实际使用的测量不确定性 - 在血液学中应用
Wytze P Oosterhuis1, Abdurrahman Coskun2, Sverre Sandberg3
1EFLM Committee: Practical Guide to Implement Measurement Uncertainty, Milan, Italy; Reinier Haga Medical Diagnostic Center, Delft, the Netherlands.
概括
本研究提出了一种实际方法,用于计算临床实验室常规血液学参数的测量不确定性 (MU). 这些发现表明,MU可以在实验室集团内有效确定和改进,确保可靠的诊断测试.
科学领域:
- 临床实验室科学 临床实验室科学
- 医学诊断 医学诊断 医学诊断
- 医疗保健中的质量管理
背景情况:
- 认证标准要求监测和报告临床实验室的测量不确定性 (MU).
- 目前对MU计算的指导方针可能很复杂,需要务实的方法.
- 内部质量控制 (IQC) 数据为MU估计提供了可行的基础.
研究的目的:
- 评估一个替代的,实用方法来计算MU在一个多实验室设置.
- 用IQC数据评估常规血液学参数的MU.
- 识别和解决导致不同测量系统结果变化的因素.
主要方法:
- 应用了使用内部质量控制 (IQC) 结果的务实MU计算方法.
- 在七个实验室分析了11个测量系统的常规血液学参数.
- 采用图形和差异组件分析来确定分歧的来源.
- 将计算的MU与基于生物变异 (MU-APS) 的确定的极限进行比较.
主要成果:
- 大多数血液学测试的测量不确定性 (MU) 处于MU-APS极限内.
- 细胞计数参数,不包括索引,符合生物变异规格.
- 一个校正程序成功地改善了偏差测量系统的 MU.
- 在实验室集团中导致不同结果的因素被确定并减轻.
结论:
- 在实验室集团中的血液学测试中,实用MU计算方法是可行的.
- 内部质量控制数据为常规血液学中MU估计提供了可靠的基础.
- 可以解决已识别的变化源,以提高测量系统的性能和可靠性.
相关概念视频
Uncertainty: Overview
978
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
978
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
80.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
80.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
44.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
44.2K
Contaminants and Errors
140
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
140
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
884
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
884
Random and Systematic Errors
12.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.6K


