在中风患者中修改的盒子和块试验和向的盒子和块试验的有效性和可靠性
Lütfiye Akkurt1, Cihan Caner Aksoy1, Fatıma Yaman2
1Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.
Applied neuropsychology. Adult
|August 11, 2025
概括
修改后的盒子和块测试 (mBBT) 和目标盒子和块测试 (tBBT) 显示出强大的有效性和可靠性,用于评估中风患者的手术技巧. 与传统的BBT相比,这些标准化测试提供了更好的测量准确性.
科学领域:
- 康复医学 康复医学 康复医学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 临床评估 临床评估
背景情况:
- 盒子和块测试 (BBT) 是一种标准工具,用于评估中风幸存者的单方面手动灵巧.
- 传统的BBT因非标准化管理而存在显著的测量变化.
- 在中风康复中,需要更可靠和有效的灵敏度评估.
研究的目的:
- 评估盒子和块试验的两个修改版本的有效性和可靠性:修改的BBT (mBBT) 和目标BBT (tBBT).
- 将mBBT和tBBT的表现与中风患者的既定临床评估进行比较.
主要方法:
- 50名中风患者参与了这项研究.
- 评估标准的有效性是通过将mBBT和tBBT得分与9洞测试 (9-HPT),Fugl-Meyer评估-上肢 (FMA-UE) 和传统BBT相关.
- 分析了mBBT和tBBT的测试-重新测试可靠性.
主要成果:
- 无论mBBT还是tBBT都显示出与9-HPT具有强烈的正相关性,以及与传统BBT具有强烈的负相关性,对受影响更严重的手 (p < 0.001).
- 在mBBT/tBBT和FMA-UE之间观察到适度的正相关性,用于受影响更严重的手 (p < 0.001).
- 对于mBBT和tBBT的类内相关系数 (ICC) 从0.86到0.97不等,表明其可靠性很高.
结论:
- 修改后的盒子和块测试 (mBBT) 和准的盒子和块测试 (tBBT) 是有效和可靠的工具来评估中风患者的手术技巧.
- 这些修改后的测试为临床使用和研究中风康复中提供了比传统的BBT更标准化和更准确的替代方案.
相关概念视频
02:07Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:15Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
01:20Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...