Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.7K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.0K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Stem cell therapy-based approaches in experimental endometriosis: a systematic review.

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E·2026
Same author

Safe Fairness Guarantees Without Demographics in Classification: Spectral Uncertainty Set Perspective.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell secretome modulates macrophage polarization in a preconditioning-dependent manner.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2026
Same author

Improving Diagnostic Yield in Peritoneal Endometriosis: Value of Additional Level Sections and Sampling Protocols.

International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists·2025
Same author

[Strategies and Barriers to the Implementation of Continuing Education in Sentinel Hospitals for the Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Honduras, 2022-2023Formação continuada: estratégias e barreiras de implementação em hospitais sentinela para a vigilância da segurança das vacinas contra a COVID-19 em Honduras, 2022-2023].

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2024
Same author

Female Models in AI and the Fight Against COVID-19.

F1000Research·2024
Same journal

Relation DETR+: Exploring Explicit Position Relation Prior for Dense Prediction.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

CAFE: Cross-View Adaptive Fusion and Cluster Center Enhancement for Robust Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

DIVER: Reinforced Diffusion Breaks Imitation Bottlenecks in End-to-End Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Learning Shape Anchors for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

可靠的编程软弱监督与标签概率的信心区间.

Veronica Alvarez, Santiago Mazuelas, Steven An

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
    |August 11, 2025
    PubMed
    概括
    此摘要是机器生成的。

    这项研究引入了一种用于编程弱监督的新方法,提高了标签预测可靠性. 它为标签概率提供置信区间,解决当前技术的局限性.

    更多相关视频

    Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays
    06:13

    Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

    Published on: February 21, 2020

    6.7K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    13.8K

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
    12:18

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Published on: January 11, 2020

    7.6K
    Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays
    06:13

    Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

    Published on: February 21, 2020

    6.7K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    13.8K

    科学领域:

    • 机器学习 机器学习
    • 数据科学数据科学数据科学
    • 人工智能的人工智能

    背景情况:

    • 准确的数据集标签是昂贵和耗时的.
    • 编程弱监督使用多个标记函数 (LF) 进行概率预测.
    • 现有的方法缺乏对概率标签的可靠性评估.

    研究的目的:

    • 开发一个程序化的弱监督方法,为标签概率提供置信区间.
    • 为了提高来自弱标记函数的预测的可靠性.
    • 为应对各种LF类型和未知的相互依赖的挑战.

    主要方法:

    • 使用分布的不确定性集来建模LF信息.
    • 封装来自LF的信息,具有不受限制的行为和类型学.
    • 制定一个程序性的弱监管框架,以信任度估计.

    主要成果:

    • 与最先进的方法相比,证明了更好的预测可靠性.
    • 展示了生成的置信区间的实用性和实用性.
    • 通过对多个基准数据集的实验验证.

    结论:

    • 拟议的方法论通过提供可靠的预测和置信区间来增强程序性弱监管.
    • 该方法有效地处理多样化和相互依存的弱标签功能.
    • 这项工作在为数据集创建可靠的概率标签方面取得了重大进展.