Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.1K
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways01:22

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

6.5K
At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category,...
6.5K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

208
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
208
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

698
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
698

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Meta-analysis of defocus curves of monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus IOLs.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2025
Same author

A review of angle kappa and multifocal intraocular lenses and their effect on visual outcomes.

Acta ophthalmologica·2025
Same author

Ethnicity-Based Differences in Corneal Asphericity: Intraocular Lens Power Calculation, Image Quality, and Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery Using Eye Models.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

[Alcohol Dependence: one or more nosological entities? Identifying geographical diversities among patients through DSM-4 and Artificial Intelligence].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2025
Same author

Impact of Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity: a Combined Analysis.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2024
Same author

Population mortality before and during the COVID-19 epidemic in two Sudanese settings: a key informant study.

BMC public health·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.0K

字母对比度敏感性验证字母对比度验证

Michel Guillon1, Pasquale Pepe1, Jessie Hull2

  • 1Ocular Technology Group - International, London, UK.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|August 16, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

计算机化字母对比度灵敏度 (CS) 测试显示了高可重复性和较低的测试差异,相比形方法. 这证实了其用于评估各种条件下的功能视力.

关键词:
计算机化信件测试 计算机化信件测试对比度的敏感度对比度的敏感度侧侧面试验 侧侧面试验测试重复测试可重复性

更多相关视频

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

560
Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
05:10

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

3.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

560
Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
05:10

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

3.5K

科学领域:

  • 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
  • 视觉科学 视觉科学 视觉科学
  • 临床测量 临床测量

背景情况:

  • 对比度敏感度 (CS) 对于评估功能视力至关重要.
  • 评估完整的CS函数需要评估多个空间频率.
  • 计算机化测试提供了一种方法来评估CS在各种空间频率.

研究的目的:

  • 为了验证计算机化字母和正弦对比度灵敏度 (CS) 方法.
  • 用不同的空间频率和照明条件来确定CS测量的可重复性.

主要方法:

  • 一项前性研究使用三个方法比较了CS测量的可重复性:计算机化字母CS,计算机化正弦形CS (M&S Technologies) 和印刷正弦形CS (VectorVision).
  • 测量是在光学和中光学条件下进行的 (有/没有光).
  • 在20名参与者中通过比较访问之间的平均差异和95%置信区间来评估可重复性.

主要成果:

  • 在大多数空间频率上,计算机化字母CS显示测试变异明显低于M&S或VectorVision仪器.
  • 字母CS的精度与容忍率较低,并且需要更小的样本大小才能获得可比的精度.
  • 计算机化字母方法显示出优异的重复性.

结论:

  • 评估CS函数的计算机化字母方法具有很高的可重复性.
  • 这种方法提供了明显较低的测试方差相比形仪器.
  • 计算机化字母CS是评估功能视力的可靠工具.