来自基于说服性论证理论的意见形成模型的分析见解
Lucía Pedraza1,2,3, Nicolas Saintier4,5, Juan Pablo Pinasco4,6
1Universidad de Buenos Aires, FCEN-DF, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Physical review. E
|August 19, 2025
概括
本研究介绍了一种基于说服性论证理论 (PAT) 的意见形成的新数学模型. 它揭示了同性恋对于在小组讨论中出现双极化至关重要.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 数学建模的数学建模
背景情况:
- 现有的意见形成模式往往使用模仿或多数规则.
- 说服性论证理论 (PAT) 通过论证交换来解释意见的变化,但在分析模型中表现不足.
- 基于PAT的意见动态的分析研究很少.
研究的目的:
- 开发和分析一种基于说服性论证理论 (PAT) 的观点形成的新数学模型.
- 在PAT下调查代理组的集体动态,特别关注准共识和双极化.
- 确定导致这些集体动态的条件,特别是同性恋的作用.
主要方法:
- 基于PAT原则的分析数学模型的开发.
- 基于代理的场景的模拟和分析,具有不同数量的参数和同类程度.
- 检查新出现的集体行为,如准共识和双极化.
主要成果:
- 拟议的基于PAT的模型可以产生两个不同的集体动态:准共识和双极化.
- 在这个模型框架内,双极化取决于同性恋的存在.
- 论点的数量会影响观察到的动态,但同型性是双极化的关键因素.
结论:
- 说服性论据理论为建模复杂的意见动态提供了一个可行的框架.
- 同性恋在推动代理群体的意见碎片化 (双极化) 中发挥着至关重要的作用.
- 未来的研究可以扩展这个模型,探索论证和社会影响的更细致的方面.
相关概念视频
Routes of Persuasion
65.1K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
65.1K
Persuasion Strategies
39.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
39.6K
Social Proof
28.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.5K
Confirmation Biases
7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Group Polarization
35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
Framing Effects
7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K


