关于数量和频率的调查问题根据年龄在预测未来酒精消费方面的有效性不同
Sarah Callinan1, Simon D'Aquino1, Ben Riordan1
1Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Drug and alcohol review
|August 19, 2025
概括
酒精查工具是更有效的,当量身定制的年龄. 频率预测了年轻人的未来饮酒,而数量对老年人来说更好,为个性化干预提供了信息.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 流行病学 流行病学
- 药物成科学 药物成科学
背景情况:
- 横截面研究表明,酒精消费查效率与年龄相关的差异.
- 饮酒频率预测了年轻人的依赖,而饮酒量则预测了老年人的依赖.
研究的目的:
- 为了确定是否与年龄相关的酒精查工具有效性的差异在纵向持续.
- 为了研究饮酒量与饮酒频率在10年内的预测价值.
主要方法:
- 从家庭收入和劳动动力学调查 (2001-2010年和2012-2020年) 中对9076名澳大利亚成年人 (15岁以上) 的纵向分析.
- 来自第一波调查的标准化饮酒量和频率得分预测了10年后的消费.
- 分析按年龄组分层:<36岁和>49岁.
主要成果:
- 与老年人相比,饮酒频率是年轻人 (年龄<36岁) 未来饮酒的更强有力的预测因素.
- 与年轻人相比,饮酒量是老年人 (年龄大于49岁) 未来饮酒量的更强有力的预测因素.
- 在数量和频率的预测能力上观察到基于年龄的显著差异.
结论:
- 通常使用的酒精查问题 (数量,频率) 在预测未来的重度饮酒时,在不同年龄组具有不同的有效性.
- 特定年龄的酒精查工具可以改善对有害饮酒风险的个体的识别.
- 量身定制的查方法可以提高旨在减少与酒精有关的伤害的干预措施的有效性.
更多相关视频
08:45Modeling Alcohol Consumption in Rodents Using Two-Bottle Choice Home Cage Drinking and Microstructural Analysis
Published on: November 8, 2024
758
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
9.9K
相关概念视频
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Observational Studies
9.0K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
9.0K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Longitudinal Research
12.5K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.5K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.7K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.7K
