相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

高风险测试中的基于过程的措施:在军事航空选择中对构造有效性的实际影响

Joseph T Coyne¹, Laura Jamison², Kaylin Strong³

¹Informaiton Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA. joseph.t.coyne4.civ@us.navy.mil.

Cognitive research: principles and implications

|August 19, 2025

概括

熟悉高风险的飞行员选择测试,如空间能力和注意力测量,可能会降低其有效性. 实践否定了新性,影响了构造测量和训练预测.

科学领域:

认知心理学认知心理学
人类因素工程人类因素工程
心理测试测试心理测试测试

背景情况:

高风险测试中的基于过程的措施依赖于任务的新性.
飞行员选择电池面临申请人实践和测试复制的挑战.
申请人的动机和获取非官方测试准备软件的影响测量有效性.

研究的目的:

为了比较基于过程的空间能力和注意力测量在高风险的军事飞行员选择电池与基于实验室的测量.
调查实践和熟悉对这些措施有效性的影响.
评估高风险措施对飞行培训结果的预测能力.

主要方法:

307名海军飞行学生完成了空间能力,注意力和一般处理措施.
一个空间任务与海军的飞行员选择电池任务相同.
实验室和高风险版本的测试被管理和与培训结果相关联.

主要成果:

实验室空间能力测量高度相关,但高风险版本与实验室测量没有相关性.
高风险的空间和注意力测量与训练结果没有相关性,与实验室测量不同.
在高风险环境中熟悉和实践似乎会降低测试测量构造和预测性能的能力.

结论:

实践和熟悉高风险的基于过程的措施可以使其预期的构造测量无效.
由于实践的影响,高风险的措施可能会失去对培训结果的预测有效性.
测试开发人员必须考虑高风险环境中的申请者实践,特别是对于依赖新性的措施.

更多相关视频

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Published on: May 19, 2023

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Published on: August 8, 2019

相关概念视频

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing...

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...