Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

279
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
279
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

12.2K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
12.2K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

2.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
2.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Hyaluronic acid targeted and pH-responsive nanocarriers based on hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for chemo-photodynamic combination therapy.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2020
Same author

Tumor phase recognition using cone-beam computed tomography projections and external surrogate information.

Medical physics·2020
Same author

Realization of a time-correlated photon counting technique for fluorescence analysis.

Biomedical optics express·2020
Same author

Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Lipomatosis of Nerve: A Review of Ultrasonographic Finding for 8 Cases.

World neurosurgery·2020
Same author

Is dietary fat associated with the risk of age-related macular degeneration? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine·2020
Same author

Comparing the Prevalence of Poor Sleep and Stress Metrics in Basic versus Advanced Life Support Emergency Medical Services Personnel.

Prehospital emergency care·2020
Same journal

Validation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Systems in Respiratory Gating Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Emerging Outcome Trends From Proton Therapy for Pediatric CNS Tumors: A Systematic Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Biologically Effective Dose-Optimized Multi-Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy: A Biologically Comparable Alternative to Proton Arc Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Characterization of a Low-Energy Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam for Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Phenomenological Study of Intra-Spill Break Spots in Dose-Driven Continuous Scanning Proton Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

最坏情况下的IMPT稳定性评估方法:一个关键的比较

Chunbo Liu1,2, Chris J Beltran2, Jiajian Shen3

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

International journal of particle therapy
|August 20, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

评估强度调节质子疗法 (IMPT) 的强度对于安全的剂量输送至关重要. 这项研究比较了方法,建议使用DVH波段和素最坏情况分析进行有效的临床IMPT计划评估.

关键词:
强度调节的质子疗法强度评估最糟糕的情况

更多相关视频

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

科学领域:

  • 医学物理
  • 辐射瘤学
  • 放射治疗计划

背景情况:

  • 在强度调节质子疗法 (IMPT) 临床实践中,强度评估对于确保准确的剂量输送至关重要.
  • 尽管它很重要,但对IMPT计划稳定性评估的最佳方法缺乏共识.
  • 这项研究研究了最坏情况的各种方法,以告知临床决策.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较强度调节质子疗法 (IMPT) 计划的不同强度评估方法的有效性.
  • 为选择实用和临床适用的IMPT计划评估策略提供见解.
  • 确定各种稳定性评估技术的相关性和能力.

主要方法:

  • 在20个临床IMPT计划 (10个前列腺,10个头部和部) 中评估了5种强度评估方法.
  • 方法包括:错误条剂量分布 (ebDD),根平均平方错误剂量分布 (RMSED),最坏情况,物理场景最坏情况和剂量体积图 (DVH) 波段.
  • 分析了方法之间的相关性,并评估了它们检测剂量错误的定量/质量能力.

主要成果:

  • 在ebDD和RMSED之间以及在voxel最坏情况和物理最坏情况之间观察到强烈的相关性.
  • DVH带提供了对标准的剂量变化的清晰概述,但缺乏空间定位.
  • 在Voxel方面,最糟糕的情况在剂量分配中突出地确定了特定的关注领域.
  • 最糟糕的物理场景确定了问题区域,但对多个地区/指标来说可能很麻烦.

结论:

  • 不同的稳定性评估方法为IMPT计划的评估提供了不同的,有价值的信息.
  • 建议采用联合策略:使用物理不确定性场景中的DVH频段进行标准检查.
  • 当DVH频段显示潜在问题时,应使用voxel-wise最坏情况分析以空间定位风险.