相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

国家环境对欧洲的COVID-19疫苗犹的影响:多层次的方法

Michael Bergmann^1,2, Arne Bethmann³, Tessa-Virginia Hannemann²

¹SHARE Survey Methodology, SHARE Berlin Institute, Germany.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences

|August 20, 2025

概括

国家背景显著影响50岁以上成年人对COVID-19疫苗的犹. 更高的死亡率和医疗保健支出促进了疫苗接种,

科学领域:

公共卫生
流行病学
社会科学

背景情况:

在全球范围内,COVID-19疫情凸显了疫苗的犹.
了解影响老年人接种疫苗的因素对于公共卫生战略至关重要.
50岁以上的人口是疫苗接种活动的关键人口.

研究的目的:

在COVID-19大流行期间调查欧洲和以色列50岁及以上人群对疫苗的犹.
分析国家环境和个人决定因素对疫苗接种意向的影响.
应用世界卫生组织 (WHO) 的自满,便利和信心 (3Cs) 模式.

主要方法:

利用来自28个国家的48000多名受访者参与的SHARE冠状病毒调查 (SCS1和SCS2) 的数据.
使用多变量逻辑回归模型分析影响疫苗接种意向的因素.
检查了感知到的风险 (自满),疫苗的可用性 (方便性) 和信任 (信心) 作为关键决定因素.

主要成果:

较高的COVID-19死亡率和更严格的制措施与减少自满和增加疫苗接种有关.
增加的医疗保健支出和更高的人类发展指数 (HDI) 分数与改善的便利性和更高的疫苗接种率相关.
对政府,卫生当局和疫苗的信任正面预测了信心和疫苗接种意图,并观察到显著的国家差异.

结论:

疫苗犹是由个体和国家因素的复杂相互作用影响的.
成功的疫苗接种活动需要解决个人犹和系统障碍.
公众信任,强大的医疗保健系统和有针对性的沟通对于缓解犹和改善疫情应对至关重要.

关键词:

3C模型美国分享世界卫生组织自满的情绪没有信心方便性宏观指标多层次的国家背景疫苗的犹权重表示

更多相关视频

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published on: February 3, 2023

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

相关概念视频

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Vaccinations

Vaccinations

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Factors Affecting Illness

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...