在流行病学课程中作为反种族主义教学的种族亲和联盟 (RAC)
Wendy E Barrington1,2,3, Ramya Kumar1,4, Collrane Frivold1,5
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
American journal of epidemiology
|August 21, 2025
概括
流行病学上的反种族主义期刊俱乐部使用种族亲和小组 (RAC) 来放大BIPOC学生的声音. 这种教学干预成功地支持学生,增强课堂学习和参与反种族主义实践.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生
- 流行病学教育
- 反种族主义教学
背景情况:
- 在流行病学中实施了虚拟的反种族主义期刊俱乐部以解决系统不平等问题.
- 学生的反表明需要在讨论中解决占主导地位的声音.
- 种族亲和小组 (RAC) 作为一个教育干预措施.
研究的目的:
- 通过实施研究综合框架 (CFIR) 审查实施RAC的过程和决定因素.
- 通过公共卫生关键种族实践 (PHCRP) 确定种族主义如何在干预中运作.
- 评估学生对整体课程有效性和RAC干预效力的看法.
主要方法:
- 分析了匿名的课程评价和学生的定性评论.
- 使用CFIR框架来评估实施因素.
- 在干预的背景下,PHCRP被用来批判性地研究种族主义.
主要成果:
- 整体疗程的有效性被评为高 (平均值为4. 8/5).
- RAC干预的有效性被评为积极的 (平均值为3. 7/5).
- 学生们赞同RAC作为支持BIPOC学生的创新,并指出实施障碍和促进者.
结论:
- 包括RAC在内的反种族主义实践可以促进流行病学中的有效课堂学习.
- 对于落实反种族主义干预措施至关重要的是灵活性,谦卑,勇气和从失败中学习.
- 尽管面临挑战, 干预措施在支持边缘化声音和促进批判性参与方面取得了成功.
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.4K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.4K
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Causality in Epidemiology
822
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
822
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
675
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
675
Introduction to Epidemiology
987
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
987
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155


