Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

243
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
243
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

188
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
188
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

133
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
133
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

199
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
199

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Human rights and the social determinants of mental health: fostering interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2025
Same author

Predicting the Risk of Future Terrorism: Lessons for Mental Health Experts from the Benbrika Case.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Interdisciplinary Collaboration in the Mental Health Sector: Legislating the Victorian Collaborative Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing.

Journal of law and medicine·2024
Same author

Human rights promotion and the 'Geneva impasse' in mental healthcare: scoping review.

BJPsych open·2023
Same author

An analysis of arguments for the retention of the defence of mental impairment.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2023
Same author

Seizures, Postictal States and Criminal Responsibility.

Journal of law and medicine·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

575

算法风险评估和专家证据

Bernadette McSherry1

  • 1Emeritus Professor, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. The author would like to thank Andrew Simon-Butler for his research assistance.

Journal of law and medicine
|August 25, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

法医风险评估工具有助于法律决策, 但专有算法引发了伦理和法律问题. 结构化的专业判断平衡了工具与临床专业知识.

关键词:
卢米斯诉威斯康星州算法风险评估结构化的专业判断

更多相关视频

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

575
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

科学领域:

  • 法医心理学
  • 法律医学
  • 犯罪学

背景情况:

  • 风险评估在法律环境中至关重要,尤其是刑事法律.
  • 法医心理学家和精神病学家评估未来犯罪活动的风险.
  • 使用的工具包括统计或精算风险预测尺度.

研究的目的:

  • 突出法医风险评估中的伦理和法律问题.
  • 讨论专有风险评估算法的影响.
  • 检查目前对结构化的专业判断的重视.

主要方法:

  • 审查目前的法医风险评估实践.
  • 分析结构化的专业判断方法.
  • 审查私人风险评估工具所带来的伦理和法律挑战.

主要成果:

  • 风险评估工具是法律诉讼的重要组成部分.
  • 结构化的专业判断将保险学数据与临床专业知识相结合.
  • 风险评估工具中未公开的算法造成了重大的伦理和法律困境.

结论:

  • 私营公司使用不透明的风险评估算法带来了伦理和法律上的挑战.
  • 为了公平的法律应用,必须平衡精算数据,临床判断和透明度.
  • 需要进一步讨论法医风险评估工具的监管和透明度.