学生与STEM缩写的联系及其对价值观和STEM选择的影响
Heidrun Stoeger1, Anton L Beer1, Albert Ziegler2
1Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|August 25, 2025
概括
大多数学生都知道科学,技术,工程和数学 (STEM) 的缩写, 这些协会会影响学生的学术选择, 通过他们的信仰, 影响STEM包容性.
科学领域:
- 在教育方面
- 心理学
- 社会学
背景情况:
- 许多活动旨在增加学生对科学,技术,工程和数学 (STEM) 的兴趣.
- 关于公众对STEM缩写和相关学科的熟悉程度的研究有限.
- 了解这些协会对于有效的STEM宣传至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查八年级学生对STEM的熟悉程度.
- 确定哪些STEM科目与该缩写相关联.
- 通过价值观的调解,研究这些协会如何影响STEM领域的学术和职业意图.
主要方法:
- 对1163名八年级学生进行调查 (平均年龄为13.7岁).
- 评估对STEM缩写和学科协会的熟悉程度.
- 分析价值观念对意图和选择的调解效应.
主要成果:
- 72%的学生表示熟悉STEM的缩写.
- 数学与STEM最为密切相关,其次是物理,计算机科学,化学,生物学和工程.
- STEM学科协会对学术选择的意图和课程选择产生了重大影响,由价值观介导,并因学科和性别而异.
结论:
- 学生对STEM的熟悉度很高,但相关性不同.
- 价值观是STEM缩写和学生选择之间的关系的媒介.
- 这些发现有助于定制STEM活动以提高效率和包容性.
更多相关视频
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
1.7K
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
1.2K
相关概念视频
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
38.7K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
38.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Cognitive Dissonance
33.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.6K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
130
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
130
Statistical Significance
20.4K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.4K
