在禾上升的针头? 教育的不同政治参与效应
1Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany.
Frontiers in sociology
|August 27, 2025
概括
志愿协会减少了教育层次之间的政治参与差距. 积极参与促进了参与,特别是在受教育程度较低的人群中,促进了社会凝聚力.
科学领域:
- 社会学
- 政治科学
- 社会流动性
背景情况:
- 教育成就对政治参与和协会会员有很大影响.
- 在不同教育层面的政治参与中存在显著的差距.
- 志愿协会是政治参与差异的潜在调解者.
研究的目的:
- 调查积极参与志愿协会如何影响不同教育背景的个人之间的政治参与差距.
- 确定协会参与是否可以在政治参与中跨越教育差距.
- 分析不同类型的协会对政治参与的影响.
主要方法:
- 用瑞士家庭小组的数据进行纵向分析.
- 使用统计方法来控制时间不变的内源性.
- 对协会成员和政治参与模式进行了描述性分析.
主要成果:
- 高等教育与更多的协会参与和政治参与有关.
- 在大多数形式中,积极的协会参与显著增加了政治参与.
- 对于受教育程度较低的人来说,政治参与的积极影响往往更为明显,从而缩小了教育差距.
- 某些类型的协会 (如政治政党,社区工作) 在弥合差距方面更有效.
- 高度受过教育的个人在特定的环境中获益更多,
结论:
- 志愿协会是社会流动和减少政治不平等的重要道,但经常被忽视.
- 协会有效地缓解与社会阶级相关的政治差异,促进社会凝聚力.
- 协会在政治资本上的教育差距的弥补能力各不相同; 并非所有协会都同样有效.
- 个人政治行动 (如抵制) 受到协会集体行动的影响较小.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.4K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.4K
Relationship Formation
41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K
Cause and Effect
11.3K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.3K


